Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They both should have been incarcerated, do to their priors. Area businesses have been asking for more Police presence for years. This has nothing to do with the present "New Rules" push. However, It will be "Molded" to help their agenda.
What he's saying is the cops are arresting this trash but the courts are letting them out again and again.I didn't get your comment... what I am saying is Many businesses in the area where this occurred have been Pleading for more police presence for many years. Sorry but I do not see your comment connection to mine.
I agree. The root problem is lack of prosecution. Beefing up patrols in a couple problem areas just moves the criminal element to a different block.Sorry, but I agree with the majority business Owners. The police "Presence" is inadequate.
Sorry, but I agree with the majority business Owners. The police "Presence" is inadequate.
Oregon is trying the same thing again this year.
Sorry kids, you've shown through your actions that you have no will to walk the straight and narrow. I'll donate some cash to get them a 1-way trip to an uninhabited Pacific Island...something like the Cocos. It's not too far from land, so the boat passage is fast, and it's got shark infested waters.
Meanwhile, the homeless infesting Portland are dying in driveways Homeless woman in Portland sleeping in front of garage run over by driver, dies at hospital, police say
And the Coronavirus is going to go thru Calif like the rat-infested mess that it is: California case of coronavirus is 3rd confirmed in US
And who is it that is running these s-holes, er, cities???
Invalidating State Pre-emption would be a good thing here most likely, but I still think it's a bad plan overall.
What?
But the the Washington State legislator has a bill to rescind Washington State's preemption so ever city can make their one rules so all CPL and open carriers felons.
Did I not understand the discussion?
This one:
If it comes to Oregon and every city could make it's own rules, I doubt La Grande or any of the surrounding communities are going to be harsh on gun rights. So as I said, it could be good for us here, but when I said I think it's a bad plan overall I mean that it would be bad everywhere else.
Makum sense? Or did I misunderstand what Tony617 wrote?
This is what a police presence in the absence of legal consequences looks like: