Messages
1,352
Reactions
775
I would invite those justices to read US v Miller (1939)...especially this part: "The signification attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. 'A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline.' And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time."

United States v. Miller - 307 U.S. 174 (1939) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center
 
Messages
790
Reactions
493
I would invite those justices to read US v Miller (1939)...especially this part: "The signification attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. 'A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline.' And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time."

United States v. Miller - 307 U.S. 174 (1939) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center


They do reference Miller. I haven't read all they way though it yet. I think page 4 they start talking about US vs Miller.
 
Messages
22
Reactions
7
there is a global awakening happening. i think they are almost trying to push us to civil-war. they are not obeying common law or law of the land
 

Upcoming Events

Rickreall Winter Gun Show December 10th & 11th
Rickreall, OR
Wes Knodel Gun Shows
Chehalis, WA

Latest Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top