SCOTUS rules police can collect DNA sample when one is arrested for a serious crime

[Sling Blade]

Jeez, what a bunch of chicken littles. I imagine that if you lived back in the day photography and fingerprinting were invented you guys would have been against them too.

 

[Father of four]

Jeez, what a bunch of chicken littles. I imagine that if you lived back in the day photography and fingerprinting were invented you guys would have been against them too.

Fingerprinting yep.

 

[Blitzkrieg]

Jeez, what a bunch of chicken littles. I imagine that if you lived back in the day photography and fingerprinting were invented you guys would have been against them too.

Ever heard of innocent until proven guilty, and the 5th Amendment?

 

[LoneStar]

DNA goes far beyond the fingerprinting. It can reveal a broad array of information about the donor beyond identification, including genetic make-up & health issues. Also taking DNA from a "suspect" is much worse than taking it from someone who has been convicted of a violent crime.

Jeez, what a bunch of chicken littles. I imagine that if you lived back in the day photography and fingerprinting were invented you guys would have been against them too.

 

[Burt Gummer]

The sheeple love to have their rights to their body and person trampled. Stand up against this sort of invasion of your person and this is your reward:


Man Spends 10 HOURS A DAY IN CELL For REFUSING TO ? GIVE DNA | The Daily Sheeple

 

[Father of four]

Yeah, those judges and their "contempt of court". While I do not agree with what the guy is suspected of doing, 10 hours each day in a cell, cuffed? Sounds like the Sheriff of Nottingham not 2013. I guess a judge can do whatever they want. I wonder where that is in The Constitution. I think many judges do not have the moral composure to be a judge. There has to be another way to make the guy comply or it actually may be against his rights to make him. We are supposed to have a right to not self incriminate ourselves, right? O'yeah unless we go before a Grand Jury....yeah that is surely in The Constitution. Weird.

 

[Redcap]

Yeah, those judges and their "contempt of court". While I do not agree with what the guy is suspected of doing, 10 hours each day in a cell, cuffed? Sounds like the Sheriff of Nottingham not 2013. I guess a judge can do whatever they want. I wonder where that is in The Constitution. I think many judges do not have the moral composure to be a judge. There has to be another way to make the guy comply or it actually may be against his rights to make him. We are supposed to have a right to not self incriminate ourselves, right? O'yeah unless we go before a Grand Jury....yeah that is surely in The Constitution. Weird.

I hope Campbell sets the judge's house on fire with him in it.

 

[Father of four]

 

[Blitzkrieg]

Extreme situations require extreme measures