JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
If they were required to turn over communication between the employees, all those "cartoons" could be legit emails exchanged with coworkers sending eachother jokes.

Regardless, it's BS to try and sue Remington due to the killers actions. They should also sue the brand of shoes, shirt, pants, and underwear he wore.
 
If they were required to turn over communication between the employees, all those "cartoons" could be legit emails exchanged with coworkers sending eachother jokes.

Regardless, it's BS to try and sue Remington due to the killers actions. They should also sue the brand of shoes, shirt, pants, and underwear he wore.
I mean, if he had some Nike's on, it's definitely be a more lucrative target.
 
What about what he had for breakfast? That gave him the energy to squeeze that trigger.
hearts stars horseshoes clovers and some booms. blame the cereal.
 
They should also sue his barber and anyone who took his picture, because that is something you just can't un-see. They should sue the city for providing the streets that allowed him to drive to the school. They should sue the school for allowing him into the building. They should sue the gas station that pumped his gas. They should sue the manufacturers of everything he ever looked at, touched, ate, drank, walked on, wore, or smelled the day of the shooting because that only makes sense to the leftist collective. Someone or something else is always to blame for the actions of a sicko.
 
Please review for your records….

69A62D23-B59D-4BD6-8A58-00388E7DED8B.jpeg D172C7C7-F71B-4A4B-8A56-36856F888F78.jpeg AA32F3E2-0F63-4239-8318-799E3EF4BFD2.jpeg
 
I mean, if he had some Nike's on, it's definitely be a more lucrative target.
True. They should claim Nike "aggressively marketed" shoes to incel losers so they could run away more quickly after shooting up a school.

That said, it is my sincere desire these families get justice: A $1.00 jury award ought to do it.
 
If they were required to turn over communication between the employees, all those "cartoons" could be legit emails exchanged with coworkers sending eachother jokes.
This is exactly it. It's very common for lawyers to seek as much information as possible during discovery in an effort to effectively go fishing simply hoping to find anything that might support their chances (not only on the merits of the claim but also in terms of characterization of the opposition). Specifically requesting copies of all communication is usually a stretch for a judge to approve in a subpoena, but it's a common ask.

In this case it sounds like the judge approved it and Remington gave the plaintiffs exactly what they requested, and the plaintiffs, not finding evidence of misdeed, are instead attacking the character of Remington for giving them exactly what they asked for and complying with a subpoena. The plaintiffs are essentially trying to attack Remington's credibility for sending memes to one another, because they didn't find actual evidence of actual wrongdoing or illegal activity to support the merits of their case. They are attacking Remington for following the law (complying with a subpoena) which sort of makes sense because the entire case is a witch-hunt that should have been summarily dismissed prior to this point anyway.
 

Upcoming Events

Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors April 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top