Quantcast
  1. Sign up now and join over 35,000 northwest gun owners. It's quick, easy, and 100% free!

Ruger Mark II and Mark III, What is the difference??

Discussion in 'Handgun Discussion' started by Bajablast, Dec 12, 2009.

  1. Bajablast

    Bajablast Hillsboro, OR Active Member

    Messages:
    550
    Likes Received:
    101
    I have a Ruger Mark III 22/45 Target Model with 5.5" Bull barrel, and was wondering what the difference is between the Mark III and Mark II??

    I have seen a couple of Mark II's for sale on this forum, but can't tell what the differences are??

    Any opinions or knowledge??

    Thanks.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
     
  2. whphel

    whphel Lake Stevens Member

    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    2
    MKII/45/MKIII/45 have a different grip position(same as a 1911) MKII/MKIII, also the MKIII are more lawerized and have more safties and a narrower grip otherwize pretty much the same. I love my MKII with the 5.5bbl.
     
  3. JAFO

    JAFO OR, USA Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    556
    Likes Received:
    148
    Magazine disconnect & loaded chamber indicator. MK III has, MK II does not, IIRC.
     
  4. Partsproduction

    Partsproduction Tillamook Oregon Active Member

    Messages:
    824
    Likes Received:
    187
    I took the mag safety out, then the loaded chamber indicator. Many Mk II's have the mag release in the butt instead of where it belongs behind the trigger. I wouldn't tolerate that myself.

    I don't see a stupid worthless key lock on Mk II's but that's something else on the Mk III I got rid of quick.

    Other than that my Mk III is a great gun, extremely accurate, I cannot over emphasize that, and it shot very well right out of the box.