Quantcast
  1. Sign up now and join over 35,000 northwest gun owners. It's quick, easy, and 100% free!
  2. We're giving away over $1,000 in prizes this month in the Northwest Firearms Winter Giveaway!
    Dismiss Notice

Ruger Mark II and Mark III, What is the difference??

Discussion in 'Handgun Discussion' started by Bajablast, Dec 12, 2009.

  1. Bajablast

    Bajablast Hillsboro, OR Active Member

    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    107
    I have a Ruger Mark III 22/45 Target Model with 5.5" Bull barrel, and was wondering what the difference is between the Mark III and Mark II??

    I have seen a couple of Mark II's for sale on this forum, but can't tell what the differences are??

    Any opinions or knowledge??

    Thanks.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
     
  2. whphel

    whphel Lake Stevens Member

    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    2
    MKII/45/MKIII/45 have a different grip position(same as a 1911) MKII/MKIII, also the MKIII are more lawerized and have more safties and a narrower grip otherwize pretty much the same. I love my MKII with the 5.5bbl.
     
  3. JAFO

    JAFO OR, USA Active Member

    Messages:
    556
    Likes Received:
    148
    Magazine disconnect & loaded chamber indicator. MK III has, MK II does not, IIRC.
     
  4. Partsproduction

    Partsproduction Tillamook Oregon Active Member

    Messages:
    824
    Likes Received:
    187
    I took the mag safety out, then the loaded chamber indicator. Many Mk II's have the mag release in the butt instead of where it belongs behind the trigger. I wouldn't tolerate that myself.

    I don't see a stupid worthless key lock on Mk II's but that's something else on the Mk III I got rid of quick.

    Other than that my Mk III is a great gun, extremely accurate, I cannot over emphasize that, and it shot very well right out of the box.