RUGER LCP vs Kel-Tec .380

Discussion in 'General Firearm Discussion' started by RedneckRampage, Feb 26, 2012.

  1. RedneckRampage

    RedneckRampage
    Newberg
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,932
    Likes Received:
    544
    Trying to figure out if the RUGER is worth the extra money. I'm kinda looking at buying one or the other. Thanks.
     
  2. branson4020

    branson4020
    Forest Grove, OR
    Active Member

    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    47
    Extra money?
     
  3. unklekippy

    unklekippy
    In The Mountains Near Sprague River
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    859
    I don't really understand the extra money thing either. They are both fine pistols. I carry the LCP when carrying light and it is light, compact and surprisingly accurate. The Keltec is just fine, but if I were buying one or the other it would definitely be the Ruger. Kip
     
  4. deen_ad

    deen_ad
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,088
    Likes Received:
    1,311
    I've had both, sold the Ruger and kept the KT.
     
  5. motoman98

    motoman98
    Gresham, OR
    Active Member

    Messages:
    676
    Likes Received:
    80
    I still like the KT, added a CT. nice.
     
  6. the4thshake

    the4thshake
    Portland
    Active Member

    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    198
    I have had both. They are both ugly little pocket pistols.

    The kel tec wasn't reliable enough even with a fluff and buff. It also had a snappy recoil. I sold it dirt cheap. This was quite a few years back and they may be better now but they left a sour taste in my mouth.

    When I purchaced the lcp I was expecting pretty much the same as the kel tec. Thankfully it was quite different. Even though they look and feel similar, the Ruger is a much nicer gun IMO. The quality of worksmanship seems better. It's been 100% reliable will all types of ammo. What really got me is how much tamer it is to shoot. Even with the darn near nonexistant sights, it is quite accurate.
     
  7. shayne

    shayne
    port townsend
    Active Member

    Messages:
    338
    Likes Received:
    63
    Accuracy is about the same but when it comes to comfort , reliability , and quality Ruger wins hands down.
     
  8. wombat

    wombat
    Kirkland, WA
    Member

    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    20
    The Ruger LCP and the Kel-Tec P3AT are ... kissing cousins.

    The P3AT has a better trigger ... the LCP is better to shoot.
    The P3AT is a little thinner; the Ruger a little thicker.

    Find both at your LGS and test the fit for your hands - both, strong and weak.
    Either will need a 'break in' at the range for the gun and for you.

    Just between these two?

    I'd look a little more at the LCP.
     
  9. Bajablast

    Bajablast
    Hillsboro, OR
    Active Member

    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    134
    Neither, get the TCP from Taurus. It is the first Taurus made in the USA is pretty much the same size, and has a better grip than either the KT or LCP. It also has the best trigger of the 3.

    I have shot the KT and the grip just seems to dig into your hand. My TCP shoots any and all ammo I have put through it, and I trust it to go bang every time. Also, the trigger guard is a bit larger than the KT or LCP, so shooting with thin gloves on is easier, or if you happen to have bigger fingers it is better.

    I picked up mine for $240 delivered on Gunbroker, but they show up on this board from time to time.

    Just my thoughts based on my personal experience.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Capitalism is BO$$!!!
     
    branson4020 and (deleted member) like this.
  10. PuddleMonkey

    PuddleMonkey
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    805
    Every Kel-Tec I've looked at has quite a few cosmetic flaws on the outside, like it was a rush job or pulled off the line before it was complete.


    With that being said, if the outside of the gun looks shoddy, I have a tough time believing they paid attention to any details on the inside.
     
  11. branson4020

    branson4020
    Forest Grove, OR
    Active Member

    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    47
    +1 for Taurus TCP. Holds the slide open after the last round is fired.
     
  12. Lloyd Braun

    Lloyd Braun
    Vancouver
    Active Member

    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    29
    ive owned both, the ruger is more refined IMO
    get the ruger if you are between that and the keltec
     
  13. chariot13

    chariot13
    Near Eugene/Springfield
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    595
    I'd rather have the kel tec .32 than the kel tec .380. Like another poster said the recoil is too snappy. The gun is almost identical in weight & size as its .32 version is why.
     
  14. SIXGUNRUGER

    SIXGUNRUGER
    Forest Grove, OR
    Active Member 2015 Volunteer

    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    51
    I agree, I really like having the slide hold open on the last shot. I've had two LCPs and my father in law has a P3AT. Both the Ruger and the KT hurt the bottom of our trigger fingers after firing just a magazines worth of ammo through them. My TCP doesn't hurt at all after I shoot it. Plus the Taurus ships with TWO magazines from the factory not only ONE like the Ruger. I really hate to say this because I'm a huge Ruger fan, just not a fan of the LCP. I do have to say the fit and finish on the TCP and the LCP is way better than the P3AT though, hands down.
     

Share This Page