Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you get a mix master as assembled by the CMP armorers by all means I encourage anybody to trade out parts with other like collectors till you have a correct rifle. Post war rifles are alot easier to correct than war era due to the scarcity of parts. However if you purchased a legit re arsenal gun I would leave it as is and not correct it.Actually....
That particular rifle has undergone a "going over" to make things as "correct" as far as I could/can look up and confirm stuff. It started as a service grade CMP rifle (luck of the draw). Yes, the barrel and receiver along with some other smaller parts were correct, to begin with. BUT.....as needed, other small parts were taken and bought from maybe 5 or more other rifles (all were CMP rifles). So then, it's got the "correct" barrel, op rod (w/relief cut), rear bar sight, gas plug, trigger group, etc....
IIRC....my research was done with the help from the books by Scott A. Duff.
And of course, there is the second book.
There are many other books available and "some" details might/may vary.
Good luck to anyone attempting to make their rifle....."correct".
Aloha, Mark
I'm in that boat. My CMP rifle is a 5.93 million Springfield Armory with a original 11/55 barrel, bolt, operating rod, etc. Everything on the upper side looks original or is the correct drawing number for 1955-1956. Plus no electro pencil marks on the receiver from a '60s rebuild.If you get a mix master as assembled by the CMP armorers by all means I encourage anybody to trade out parts with other like collectors till you have a correct rifle. Post war rifles are alot easier to correct than war era due to the scarcity of parts. However if you purchased a legit re arsenal gun I would leave it as is and not correct it.
Maybe not. I will send you a pm.The stock is going to be a much harder piece to find.
-E-
Head spinning....Actually....
That particular rifle has undergone a "going over" to make things as "correct" as far as I could/can look up and confirm stuff. It started as a service grade CMP rifle (luck of the draw). Yes, the barrel and receiver along with some other smaller parts were correct, to begin with. BUT.....as needed, other small parts were taken and bought from maybe 5 or more other rifles (all were CMP rifles). So then, it's got the "correct" barrel, op rod (w/relief cut), rear bar sight, gas plug, trigger group, etc....
IIRC....my research was done with the help from the books by Scott A. Duff.
And of course, there is the second book.
There are many other books available and "some" details might/may vary.
Good luck to anyone attempting to make their rifle....."correct".
Aloha, Mark
If it was a peace meal'd post war gun put together by CMP armorers it's worth the work to trade out parts with other members till you have a self corrected rifle. If it's a re-arsenal Garand then I would totally leave it as is. In my opinion RRA/RRAD turned out the best looking examples.Head spinning....
You're one of those that likes to search high and low to build a correct rifle. I get, I don't go for that myself, but-hey, enjoy it how you like! I feel like, if you could get one of those with a likely original barrel/receiver combo that would be the shizzz. Me, I'm just thrilled to have all the correct parts from whoever made em'. Oh, the GI stock makes it pretty special too.
I might have to grab those books. My CMP M1 is a bit weird in that I have a 53 SA receiver and a '44 SA barrel. Haven't dated other (mixed manufacturer) parts yet.
Yeah....I didn't mention that the correct stock is on it too. G.A.W. w/ the circle and crossed cannons to the right of it. But the cartouche is faint.Head spinning....
You're one of those that likes to search high and low to build a correct rifle. I get, I don't go for that myself, but-hey, enjoy it how you like! I feel like, if you could get one of those with a likely original barrel/receiver combo that would be the shizzz. Me, I'm just thrilled to have all the correct parts from whoever made em'. Oh, the GI stock makes it pretty special too.
I might have to grab those books. My CMP M1 is a bit weird in that I have a 53 SA receiver and a '44 SA barrel. Haven't dated other (mixed manufacturer) parts yet.
You sure got a beautiful stock on it, that's for sure. And with those barrel measurements!I bought this through CMP, field grade for $650. It does have a COA with it.
I lucked out when I met a guy a few years ago at an OAC show when I was helping to sell a friends Garand. The friend wasn't a gun guy. The guy that helped is a pro with the M1. A Veteran Marine. When I get my gun to him to look at I'll be finding out what it's all about.Yeah....I didn't mention that the correct stock is on it too. G.A.W. w/ the circle and crossed cannons to the right of it. But the cartouche is faint.
Once I started it became an obsession (for awhile). But as I said....only once (RE : Post #31)
Aloha, Mark
PS....about the Scott A. Duff books. IMHO, it's difficult to exactly tell quickly and easily, what parts drawing numbers one should have to match their receiver number.
And then......yeah, that parts box example (Post #31).
You are a good source for CMP Garand info! What happened to all the barreled receivers they use to get? Were they all sold as is? Thought a majority of them were completed into Rack, Service, and Correct grade guns.CMP armorers do not build Service ,Field grade mixmaster rifles, they do build the expert and special grades etc with new barrels, stocks etc.
Yes Sir................looks goodWait a second.........is this the Orlando?
Here is your trigger group installed....
View attachment 1090135View attachment 1090137
-E-
Clean it yes but don't treat it like it's a M16 is was told by a M1 custom maker.Yup....you got a beautiful rifle. Field Grade and only a 2. Not to mention the metal's finish and the stock.
Just clean it/inspect it......grease and oil where appropriate. Having PASSED. Then, take her shooting.
Aloha, Mark