Everyone, I pretty much put it in the title. Just like before the planned WW2 invasion of Japan, has there ever
been a comprehensive, non-partisan, study of how many would be killed & wounded in an attempted, complete
gun confiscation in the U.S. ?
Rest assured that many would resist and refuse to go along meekly like those that marched into gas chambers.
With Presidential candidates making it an issue it would be an interesting debate point. Especially because a
former candidate suggested nuking American cities that refused to: "give up their guns."
What would be an acceptable level of killed & wounded for a candidate? 30 million, 40 million, 60 million?
Its almost like discussing the casualty rates in a nuclear exchange.
Please don't reply with "Out of my cold dead hands!" I was looking for factual numbers.
If this is offensive please ignore it.
L.B.
been a comprehensive, non-partisan, study of how many would be killed & wounded in an attempted, complete
gun confiscation in the U.S. ?
Rest assured that many would resist and refuse to go along meekly like those that marched into gas chambers.
With Presidential candidates making it an issue it would be an interesting debate point. Especially because a
former candidate suggested nuking American cities that refused to: "give up their guns."
What would be an acceptable level of killed & wounded for a candidate? 30 million, 40 million, 60 million?
Its almost like discussing the casualty rates in a nuclear exchange.
Please don't reply with "Out of my cold dead hands!" I was looking for factual numbers.
If this is offensive please ignore it.
L.B.