JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
The fight for freedom would look nothing like revolutionary war due to the technological advatage the govt forces would have. The gap today would far greater than what the American revolutionaries faced vs England. It would look more like IRA vs British or the type of fighting we see in the middle east. Bombings of govt buildings, IEDs to destroy convoys and slow their supply lines, and assinations of their leadership, commanders, and financiers. Which would turn public support against the freedom fighters due to innocent people killed who are at the wrong place at the wrong time. Other countries would assist, to squash it quick so their populace wouldnt get any ideas.

If you are fighting at your door step you have already lost. Killing soilders of your opponent would be a waste of ammo. They would be another body to fill his place and would be able to train and replace thier soilders faster. The fight would have to be taken to the people commanding and financing the effort. But they would be far away from where the violence is happening in hardened secure areas.

Another thing to remember, govt will have access to all forms of communications. They will have access to all the security cameras, door bells cameras, radio waves, and now have tools to listen to conversations without needing a Mic in a room. Lets also not forget facial recognition. Then there are real time satellites used to track any involved or suspected back to there hidout or homes. There will be no pubs to meet in that would be secure enough to speak about planning operations. Marshall law would be imposed restricting movement and voting suspended so leaders would not have to worry about losing power when bodies start to pile up.

There would be undercover agents sent out in mass to locate and infiltrate the cells of freedom fighters. This would create trust issue within the ranks of the freedom fighters, and cause in fighting. It would also allow the govt to identify and silience anyone leading an effort or had the skills to organize and plan effective attacks.

The vast size of america and everything above would make it extremely difficult for the small groups to organize a large force. If a hotspot flares up in Kanasas, freedom fighters would not be able to march to their defense like they did in the revolutionary war. While govt could have troops anywhere in the country in mass in a few hours. Which England did not have the techonogly to do at that time.

The uprising would have to take place silently over decades and even generations. You would need to take over education little by little to plant the seeds. Once you are able to indoctrinate the youth of your views you will be able to gain power little by little over time. This will get your people in places of power to be able to get your message out, like the media and appointmented to govt positions. Eventually those people will rise in power and influence, allowing them to create laws that benefit your way of thinking. And then you are able to force them to accept your beliefs as true. If they dont like it, you now have superior forces to prevent them from uprising and spreading thier way of thinking.


Sorry for the wall of text.
The government forces have families that is their weak point.
 
Everyone, I pretty much put it in the title. Just like before the planned WW2 invasion of Japan, has there ever
been a comprehensive, non-partisan, study of how many would be killed & wounded in an attempted, complete
gun confiscation in the U.S. ?

Rest assured that many would resist and refuse to go along meekly like those that marched into gas chambers.

With Presidential candidates making it an issue it would be an interesting debate point. Especially because a
former candidate suggested nuking American cities that refused to: "give up their guns."

What would be an acceptable level of killed & wounded for a candidate? 30 million, 40 million, 60 million?
Its almost like discussing the casualty rates in a nuclear exchange.

Please don't reply with "Out of my cold dead hands!" I was looking for factual numbers.

If this is offensive please ignore it.

L.B.
No there hasn't but already people are starting to get the message and are pissed. Anything being passed now including the Red Tag law is illegal and breaks the both US and State Constitution...therefore isn't law. They are asking law enforcement to break the law by enforcement. I would also question this governor's action of sending the State Police to find and return under force if necessary, those Republicans who walked out of a senate hearing out of protest. Not sure of what is going on, but these Demorats better get a hold of themselves. Losing control with these types of firearms laws will create a loss of lives. In fact it already has. Several across the country have already resulted in shooting and deaths. They still are not finished passing those laws so asking numbers isn't possible at this time. It could lead to other things and go as far as civil war if other things are added.
 
Do criminals register their guns?
That's always been the problem with gun control. You see it isn't about the guns...it's people control! It always has been. It goes way back when the Democratic Klan did not want Blacks to be armed and have equal rights, Not it's not about rights any more, just people control not even crime control as they would be punishing the criminals, and not citizens who soon will be when guns are outlawed!
 

Upcoming Events

Redmond Gun Show
Redmond, OR
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top