Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i will ask again:
How do you answer question 11f on a 4473 form?
EXCEPTION to 11. f. NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007: A person who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or committed to a mental institution is not prohibited if: (1) the person was adjudicated or committed by a department or agency of the Federal Government, such as the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (as opposed to a State court, State board, or other lawful State authority); and (2) either: (a) the persons adjudication or commitment for mental incompetency was set-aside or expunged by the adjudicating/committing agency; (b) the person has been fully released or discharged from all mandatory treatment, supervision, or monitoring by the agency; or (c) the person was found by the agency to no longer suffer from the mental health condition that served as the basis of the initial adjudication. Persons who fit this exception should answer no to Item 11.f.
It's not just the firearms that you collect, it's all that goes along with them. Consider the number of magazines for each handgun ( I generally have between 4-6 for each) and the ammo to stack behind.
BVB, you've asked 3 times now. You deal with trolls by not feeding them. You're looking for a reason to fight- its not happening. Ask your buddies why they're on ignore.
Do
Not
Feed
The
Trolls
From what he has shared, I can surmise he answers, 'NO'.
Knowing where you're getting your motivation for asking such a question, I offer the below:
I hope I'm not out of line in offering this post.
Tell us more.What we really should be asking ourselves is 1) is it any of our buisiness? the correct answer is no, 2) who here has their MD and can first tell us the type of injury he had and how it effects him outside of what he has told us. The correct answer is no one since unless you know him personally and are pervy to his medical records even if you had an MD. So, what has happened here? A predictable "grab your torch and pitchforks" session. He has no obligation to tell anyone how he filled out any form that is protected under privacy laws at the federal level. If one wants to condemn someone for merely this then you are no better than the Obamacrats that sent out letters to PTSD vets that didn't balance their check book correctly and told them to turn in their guns. Folk's this is the internet, where assumptions are wild, where people are quick to condemn, where people are slow to reason, where people talk large to boost their even larger egos. Seriously folk's, grow up. Just because one has a collection of guns and has had a brain injury does not mean one is not in their right mind.
OP through the bait in the water, looking for debate and controversy (on a hot current event) and has proven himself to be no more than a professional at researching internet excerpts. I smell a rat or something fishy......What we really should be asking ourselves is 1) is it any of our buisiness? the correct answer is no, 2) who here has their MD and can first tell us the type of injury he had and how it effects him outside of what he has told us. The correct answer is no one since unless you know him personally and are pervy to his medical records even if you had an MD. So, what has happened here? A predictable "grab your torch and pitchforks" session. He has no obligation to tell anyone how he filled out any form that is protected under privacy laws at the federal level. If one wants to condemn someone for merely this then you are no better than the Obamacrats that sent out letters to PTSD vets that didn't balance their check book correctly and told them to turn in their guns. Folk's this is the internet, where assumptions are wild, where people are quick to condemn, where people are slow to reason, where people talk large to boost their even larger egos. Seriously folk's, grow up. Just because one has a collection of guns and has had a brain injury does not mean one is not in their right mind.
Ok so riddle me this... If you replied to him did you A) belive him or B) feed the troll? its one or the other folks!
What we really should be asking ourselves is 1) is it any of our buisiness? the correct answer is no, 2) who here has their MD and can first tell us the type of injury he had and how it effects him outside of what he has told us. The correct answer is no one since unless you know him personally and are pervy to his medical records even if you had an MD. So, what has happened here? A predictable "grab your torch and pitchforks" session. He has no obligation to tell anyone how he filled out any form that is protected under privacy laws at the federal level. If one wants to condemn someone for merely this then you are no better than the Obamacrats that sent out letters to PTSD vets that didn't balance their check book correctly and told them to turn in their guns. Folk's this is the internet, where assumptions are wild, where people are quick to condemn, where people are slow to reason, where people talk large to boost their even larger egos. Seriously folk's, grow up. Just because one has a collection of guns and has had a brain injury does not mean one is not in their right mind.
It's not just the firearms that you collect, it's all that goes along with them. Consider the number of magazines for each handgun ( I generally have between 4-6 for each) and the ammo to stack behind.
*Refutes quote with another quote in the spirit of friendly competition* Your quote is right out of O'Conners "The Rifle Book"beware of the man with one gun for he knows how to use it well.....not so sure about the man who asks perfect strangers if has too many lol
It's unclear... Are you saying I have incredibly good taste in suits, cigars or beards?
*Refutes quote with another quote in the spirit of friendly competition* Your quote is right out of O'Conners "The Rifle Book"
My response is right out of Abe Lincoln's response to when he was being friendly with the Southerners after the American Civil War: "Why Sir, I am turning my enemies into my friends!"
Besides, no mater what our personal beliefs are, the big picture is a small group of gun owners- maybe,,,what? 10,000 on this board and maybe 1000 who are active out of at least the 7.5 million in Washington State plus,,,whatever Oregon, Idaho and other visitors may have and we're willing to hold to our beliefs against the entire 3 states and then some.
Sun Tzu writes on tactics that given time, a large group WILL overcome a small group. However, the small group WILL inflict serious losses on the large if the planning is done right.
Agreed. If you bought all that buy a nice fireproof safe and 15k could be 3 or 4 guns or some folks. Not an insane amount around here.Keep them but buy a safe instead of stacking them like wood.........and $15,000 isn't all that much to have in firearms.