1. Sign up now and join over 35,000 northwest gun owners. It's quick, easy, and 100% free!
  2. We're giving away over $1,000 in prizes this month in the Northwest Firearms Winter Giveaway!
    Dismiss Notice

Professor Waldman from NYU speaking Monday night on why the 2A confers no right to own guns

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by 8ball, Jul 5, 2014.

  1. 8ball

    8ball WA Quit talkin' and start chalking!

    Likes Received:
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2014
  2. ZA_Survivalist

    ZA_Survivalist Oregon AK's all day.

    Likes Received:
    So he has no right to free speech or assembly?.. Theoretically..right?

    I love how these jokers think our "national guard" constitutes as a militia.

    In no way shape or form is a militia regulated and forced to go overseas by our very own Federal Government.. To which has grown to great with power.
    Secondly, we have NOT let our men and women take their service rifles home.. Id sure like to bring that up in a debate..

    Oh so you think civilian AR15's are bad?
    Well according to your point of view professor, our "well regulated militia"
    Has the right to take home their service rifle should the need arise! So you'd actually have genuine "assault rifles" in American homes.. How about them apples..
    Which is better, I mean really..?

    Those anti guys are such a joke..
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2014
    Redcap and bnsaibum like this.
  3. deen_ad

    deen_ad Vancouver, WA Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    < Why they don't have school shootings in Israel.
    Notice the long gun slung over the teachers shoulder?

    Strange because even the SCOTUS says it's an individual right.

    NRA Life Member, Benefactor Level
    "Defender of Freedom" award
    NRA Golden Eagle member

    "Having a gun is like a parachute, if you need one and don't have it you may never need it again"
  4. bunnybunny

    bunnybunny Washington Member

    Likes Received:

    Apparently "right of the people" doesn't apply to an individual in the 2nd amendment, but it does for the 1st and 4th.

    It always baffles me how such well educated people can be so naive and dumb. He thinks he knows better than SCOTUS. Ridiculous.