- Messages
- 481
- Reactions
- 77
If I am correct, he was in possession of contraband items outside of the firearms he possessed legally. If it is only the batons that were illegal I cannot see how any of this over-reaction is justified. If he possessed illegal explosive devices I can see where he would lose his carry permit since he is guilty of a serious crime and a CCW permit is conditional on not having committed such crimes.
If I read the article correctly, he was actually charged with illegal possession of tear gas and explosive devices. The batons possession was an "also charged with" situation.
It was "explosive pepper ball projectiles". I hate to make guesses/judgements (the reporter already did a good enough job at that), but it's most likely something like these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper-spray_projectile
which are less-than lethal crowd control devices. Of course, adding the term "explosive" to the description makes the article that much more interesting to read. Illegal to own? Apparently, but bfd. This guy is getting crucified for owning batons and crowd control devices, it's ridiculous.