- Messages
- 944
- Reactions
- 912
I never said I don't lock up my weapons, you said I didn't.
You are arguing the reason people should lock up their guns is MORALS... and my reason is ECONOMICAL. I don't want mine stolen because they cost me a lot of $$$.
As I've already illustrated, the argument that you have to lock up your guns for MORAL reasons is flawed and leads to MORALLY NOT OWNING GUNS and for that, I will always argue against.
Should mine be stolen, I'm out $$$$. In your world, you may get prosecuted for not trying hard enough to keep them secure, again as I've illustrated in the absurd trigger lock, etc... example.
Kindly keep your MORALS and my FREEDOM separate.
Your morals and mine obviously differ. I care enough to secure my weapons so the likelihood of them being stolen is greatly reduced.
So you're only worried about the loss off the gun because it cost you money and don't care that not securing your weapon could put it in the hands of the wrong people?
Your argument is making as much sense as leaving your cell phone in your locked car on the dash at the mall and saying "It isn't my fault that it got stolen". Well gee, I had a lock on my gun, it isn't my fault it got stolen when I wasn't home and the kid looked in my window and saw it....
I have never said prosecute anyone, what I did say is Light, expensive things grow feet when not secured and a trigger lock just stops the trigger from being pulled temporarily but that doesn't make the weapon secure.
Open your eyes, yours is just one argument the liberal politicans use to try and justify stomping on our 2nd amendment rights!
Be part of the solution and not the problem