JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
9,751
Reactions
18,068
Pet Owners Beware: Animal Control Agencies Killing Dogs Over Unpaid Fees
Lily Dane
The Daily Sheeple
April 6th, 2015
Reader Views: 1,742



dogs.jpg

Keep a close eye on your dogs: animal control agencies across the US are hitting pet owners with large fines for small violations – and some are killing the pets of those who can't afford to pay up.

CNN Money posted a disturbing article titled Dogs Killed Over Unpaid Fines that exposes the atrocities:

In a number of cities across the country, animal control agencies are aggressively going after pet owners with big fines for small violations. Some hold people's pets until they settle their bills, even if it means they end up killed. Others leave the dogs alone but issue arrest warrants for owners who can't pay up.

The infractions can include failing to license a pet, owning a dog that barks a lot, or accidentally letting an animal get loose in the neighborhood. But the penalties are serious, often amounting to hundreds or even thousands of dollars.

So are the consequences. When owners of seized or lost dogs can't afford to get their pets back, they relinquish their rights to the animal, which can result in a pet being euthanized. Meanwhile, a CNNMoney analysis of active warrants from a sampling of 15 cities and counties across the country found thousands of outstanding warrants for small pet-related offenses.

Pet owners and animal rights attorneys say these brutal tactics are all about generating money and unfairly impact low-income families.

Of course, animal control agencies (which are usually run by local governments or contractors – go figure) say they need the revenue to keep their doors open. They also say the fees and fines are intended to encourage responsible pet ownership and keep neighborhoods and animals safe.

But some say the tactics used by such agencies are questionable.

Elizabeth Vasquez, who resides in Indio, California, says that animal control officers seized her two dogs, Silver and Canelo, for being loose in the neighborhood and fined her $500.

Vasquez says her dogs were secure in her backyard at the time.

She used her grocery money to pay $200, which was enough to get Canelo back. But animal control killed Silver before she could scrape together enough cash to bail the dog out.

Not only are these agencies scooping up dogs that have been found roaming their neighborhoods and holding them for ransom, they are sending inspectors out to homes to issue fines:

Last year, Riverside County inspectors incited controversy for going door-to-door and giving out citations of up to $400 per dog in Indio's low-income and mainly Hispanic neighborhoods. In some cases, they cited people for failing to have their pets licensed, sterilized, vaccinated and microchipped without even seeing the animals.

Riverside County told CNNMoney that this was part of its ongoing enforcement efforts across the county and residents could avoid paying the fines by fixing the violation within 30 days. While there are some low-cost options available for sterilization and other procedures, local advocates said waiting lists are often months long. They also railed against the agency for leaving wealthy, gated communities untouched.

Kim Maguire-Hardee, a local activist who runs a low-cost spay and neuter clinic, said, "They are threatening people. They are intimidating people. But if people have lawyers and speak English, they don't go there."

If your dog is accused of a crime, your pet may be held indefinitely – at very high costs to you – while you attempt to prove their innocence. Colorado resident Caitlin McAdam's dogs, Jake and Lucy, were accused of killing a neighbor's cat and were seized from her home earlier this year:

Even though no evidence was provided that linked her dogs to the incident, McAdam was told that they could be killed if she didn't pay $1,200 in upfront impound fees within 10 days.

The Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region, a contractor that handles animal control for the area, said fees are set by state law and the court determines how quickly a case gets heard.

With the help of an attorney, McAdam moved her dogs to a private facility while they await trial. This costs her $250 a week.

An initial hearing overseen by a judge was held in mid-February. And while her attorney recently learned that an autopsy of the cat found it unlikely that it was attacked by two dogs, McAdam is still awaiting a jury trial in April.

At that point, she and her attorney plan to present proof of the dogs' innocence — including multiple witnesses who were with the dogs when the alleged incident occurred.

Right now, McAdam and her family only get to see their beloved pets during approved visits. The ordeal is costing them thousands of dollars. In order to raise money to keep their dogs alive, the family has sold an old car, used a tax refund, borrowed money from friends, and raised money through crowdfunding.

If McAdam's dogs are found guilty, they may be killed anyway. If they are found innocent, she won't get back the money she's spent on keeping them alive.

"We've had to come up with extra (money) that frankly we just don't have," said McAdam, whose 9-year-old son Derrick has been traumatized by the incident. "It's hard — it's definitely hard."

Pets aren't the only ones being locked up for these violations. Their human companions are as well:

Mary Root, an 82-year-old widow from Havre de Grace, Maryland, spent two days in jail last March after her neighbor complained to animal control that her Chihuahuas had gotten loose three times.

Root was charged $525 for the incidents. Living on roughly $2,000 a month and already struggling to pay her property taxes, she couldn't afford the fines. But she was thankful nothing happened to her dogs.

When she missed a court hearing about the violations — which Root said she couldn't attend for medical reasons — an arrest warrant was issued and she was put in jail.

Root was facing up to a YEAR in jail if she didn't pay $7,000 in fines. Thankfully, a good samaritan heard her story and bailed her out. And, a pro bono attorney helped her get the fees dropped to $500, which her church and her lawyer graciously helped her pay.

****

To avoid having your dogs snatched up by the authorities, consider the following tips for responsible pet ownership:

  • Communication: Get to know your neighbors. Discuss what you expect of each other regarding pet behavior. Consider agreeing not to call animal control to resolve problems that may arise – work things out amongst yourselves instead if possible.
  • Mediation: If issues arise that you can't resolve, ask a neutral third party for assistance. Peaceful dispute resolution can help you and your neighbors avoid costly fines and fees – and the loss of a pet.
  • Knowledge: Learn how your local animal control agencies conduct business. Know the laws regarding pet ownership in your area.
  • Prevention: Post warning signs on your property.
- See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/pet-...-over-unpaid-fees_042015#sthash.iWAYwnA6.dpuf
 
Cops Respond to Wrong House, Kill Service Dog Who Worked With Children With Down Syndrome

The Free Thought Project
April 6th, 2015
Reader Views: 3,724


servicedogshot.png

By Cassandra Fairbanks

San Diego, CA– Ian Anderson, of San Diego, is heartbroken after his 6-year-old service dog, Burberry, was shot and killed by a police officer outside his home in Pacific Beach on Sunday morning.

The beautiful and beloved Pitbull began barking around 5:30 am when the police incorrectly arrived at Anderson's home for "what appeared to be" a domestic disturbance. The police had reportedly went to the wrong address.

"For six years Ian Anderson raised his beloved dog, it took just one second for a police man's bullet to kill him," NBC reporter Omari Fleming lamented.

The police had knocked on Anderson's door and when Burberry ran outside, the dog stopped barking as one officer reached down and pet him, Anderson says.

Unfortunately, the other officer on the scene had an extreme reaction to the beautiful grey dog who reportedly worked with children with down syndrome, and began yelling at the animal, demanding that he go inside. The dog became startled, and the officer drew his weapon and ended Burberry's happy life.

"[The officer] jumped back, went this way, drew his weapon," Anderson told NBC. "Boom. Shot right in the head and he was done. He was dead."

Anderson laid outside grieving for two hours with the body of his pet, and friend, who had helped him through his anxiety while coping with the loss of his father.

"He was the best dog in the entire world, I would do anything to have him back right now, absolutely anything." Anderson tearfully explained.

The San Diego Police Department issued a statement which noticeably lacked any sort of apology for the grief and pain they have caused.

"The preservation of life is our top priority and this includes the lives of animals. This incident is currently being investigated as any Officer Involved Shooting would be to assure proper procedures were followed. Any further comments prior to the completion of the investigation would simply be premature."

A non-profit called Dog Encounter Task Force at San Diego AWOL is devoted to training police officers to safely work with dogs and reduce the number of animals killed by law enforcement. They have stated that they previously reached out and offered their services for free, to no avail.

"There seems to be no question here that this incident did not have to happen. It really makes no difference if this dog was a service dog or not. Our organization has been in conversation with the San Diego Police Department for over 16 months to get them into our TOTALLY FREE Safe Dog Encounter Training. As yet they have not seen the importance of this training for their agency. We stand at the ready to make sure that our officers can safely deal with dog encounters while keeping everyone else safe too – our dogs and innocent bystanders."

They continued on to say,

"Our experiences tell us that law enforcement is just like everyone else in that when they know better they do better. Within the training of most law enforcement agencies in the country they actually have no safe dog encounter training. For example they are not even trained that the very "command presence" posture they are taught in the academy, for use with humans and works well with mountain lions and bears, is viewed as confrontational and highly threatening by dogs. But without safe dog encounter training they have not learned that part yet. Many are taught in the academy that pepper spray does not work with dogs when it is proven that it does! We teach then how to properly read a dog's body language and signals in order to accurately the situation and how to use their own body language to negotiate with a dog in order to diffuse a situation. For those situations where actual action is required we teach them no less than 19 non-lethal ways to keep a dog encounter safe for everyone. Does that mean that dogs will never get shot. No it does not and we realize that. We just want to stop the unnecessary dog shootings and we can through the right kind of training."

- See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/cops...ith-down-syndrome_042015#sthash.069RCTor.dpuf
 

Upcoming Events

Redmond Gun Show
Redmond, OR
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top