Pentagon to Destroy Ammo

Discussion in 'General Firearm Discussion' started by RicInOR, Apr 28, 2014.

  1. RicInOR

    RicInOR
    Washington County
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    5,076
    Likes Received:
    8,034
    http://www.stripes.com/report-pentagon-to-destroy-1b-in-ammunition-1.280372

    First thought was say it isn't so.
    But the story makes it out much worse - they don't know the state of the ammo and I'd hate for them to issue something which could catastrophically fail when fired. I am shocked they didn't track it better.

    Not really.

    While in the reserves, I spend one 2 week session documenting ships stores. Found a million dollars worth of engine room parts - high end gaskets, pipes and the like. It was all there, just not documented.
     
  2. Mark W.

    Mark W.
    Silverton, OR
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    6,132
    Likes Received:
    5,962
    That was a horribly written article that had little explanation for why or what or really if ammo was going to be destroyed. After reading it I was more confused.

    The Army doesn't tell the other services what ammo they have surplus so the other services buy what they need. OK so that leaves ammo in the Armys stockpile. I fail to see how that equates to having to destroy ammo.

    As to small arms ammo catastrophically failing HUH? how? I have shot thousands of surplus rounds some dating back to 1927 and I don't remember any failures. How would ammo less then 1/4th that old at the oldest be a problem?
     
    Caveman Jim likes this.
  3. cookie

    cookie
    THE SOCIALIST STATE OF KALI - FORNIA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,113
    Likes Received:
    580
    The goobernemt is not your friend.
     
    Caveman Jim and orygun like this.
  4. orygun

    orygun
    West Linn
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    4,460
    Likes Received:
    3,801
    Especially not this goobernment.
     
  5. Jim Colvill

    Jim Colvill
    1 A.U. from a G2 near Beaverton
    Old Army Cook Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    795
    Likes Received:
    1,479
    It's GDP boosting in traditional government tradition: Purchase a billion rounds of ammo, destroy 90% of it , re-order to rebuild stockpile...lather, rinse, repeat.
     
    Bigboblargerobert likes this.
  6. Miyamoto Musashi

    Miyamoto Musashi
    Central Oregon
    "Do nothing which is of no use"

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    45
    I would be happy to destroy it for them at no cost to the tax payer. Right out the end of my barrel.:D:D:D3 smiles cuz that would be me when I was done!
     
    Jim Colvill likes this.
  7. pyromancer

    pyromancer
    Portland
    Freelance Graphic Designer

    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    147
  8. Caveman Jim

    Caveman Jim
    West of Oly
    Springer Slayer 2016 Volunteer 2017 Volunteer

    Messages:
    7,486
    Likes Received:
    15,814
    I have a hunch that if and when they do look into the matter they will find much less than they thought they knew.......

    We all know what happens when beaurocrats get their meat hooks on anything.....
     
  9. coop44

    coop44
    Tacoma ,WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,718
    Likes Received:
    1,134
    I wouldn't mind a couple of old obsolete LAWS rockets, bet you dimes to donuts there are some still sitting in a dusty corner somewhere.
     
  10. RicInOR

    RicInOR
    Washington County
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    5,076
    Likes Received:
    8,034
    I would argue the 2nd guarantees you the right to own a LAWS.
     
  11. The Heretic

    The Heretic
    Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,588
    Likes Received:
    10,987
    It recognizes your right to be armed.

    It doesn't guarantee that the government will not infringe your rights when they ignore the Constitution.
     
    BigStick likes this.
  12. jvbutter

    jvbutter
    Cornelius, Or
    Active Member

    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    40
    definitely a lack of "reason why" in the article.
     
  13. Ligito

    Ligito
    Oregon
    Active Member

    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    136
    Typical military supply tactic. Sometimes they get stuff they shouldn't have and then they have to hide it from IG inspectors because they also can't get rid of it.
     
  14. BigStick

    BigStick
    Sherwood, OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    311
    Wow, that perfectly sums up the state of afairs we are currently dealing with for the entire Constitution. Well said.
     
  15. Mark W.

    Mark W.
    Silverton, OR
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    6,132
    Likes Received:
    5,962
    Nothing in the articles I have read says that any small arms ammo will be included in any destruction. They mention small arms ammo in a couple places but nothing to do with destruction. In fact they mention it in ways that barely has anything to do with the article at all. Since they do mention anything from small arms to Air to ground & Ground to Air missiles. It wouldn't take much to add up to 1.2 Billion pretty fast. Like I said a horribly written article with few if any facts and a lot of stirring the pot.
     

Share This Page