Papa John’s Announces Verdict in Victim’s Future Employment

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by fredball, Feb 3, 2015.

  1. fredball

    fredball
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,274
    Likes Received:
    5,859
    I for one will buy all my Pizza from now on at papa John's
    Solid American Company I say we all shop there and when we go in to order mention this verdict .
    This is just me Talking

    Pizza Delivery Woman Shoots Attacker in Face – Papa John’s Announces Verdict in Victim’s Future Employment


    PapaJohns-860x280.jpg
    A Georgia woman was delivering pizza recently for Papa John’s, when a man approached her car with a gun and attempted to rob her. When he threw her face down on the ground, she pulled her own handgun from her pocket and shot him in the face, killing him.

    The woman has since worried about losing her job, as Papa John’s has a policy forbidding the carrying of firearms by delivery personnel, even to defend themselves.

    The national chain has now announced their decision, telling Fox News the woman will not lose her job in this case.

    The safety of Papa John’s employees is a top priority for our company.

    Company policy prohibits employees from utilizing firearms in the performance of their duties. We plan no changes to our current policy, which is designed to protect customers and employees.

    Upon investigation and considering the specific facts of the situation, we have reassigned the employee to work in the store and are offering her counseling to help her recuperate from the incident.

    Captain Stephen Fore of the DeKalb County Police Department also voiced his support, telling local television station WSB-TV:

    She had no other choice. She must have been in fear for her life and she reacted.

    The driver will not face any charges in the shooting.
     
    Riot, orygun, lowly monk and 5 others like this.
  2. Caveman Jim

    Caveman Jim
    West of Oly
    Springer Slayer 2016 Volunteer 2017 Volunteer

    Messages:
    6,816
    Likes Received:
    13,611
    It's too bad that corporate America shuns ones right to protect themselves only to keep their corporate image from being tarnished by the use of a constitutional right (bear arms).
    Corporations will do nothing to keep their outside employees safe but hire mega muscle to protect the elites in the company. :mad:

    It's Pappa Johns for us from now on!!!:)
     
  3. pchewn

    pchewn
    Beaverton Oregon USA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    332
    But they haven't changed their policy!
     
  4. etrain16

    etrain16
    Oregon
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    10,029
    Likes Received:
    26,392
    And they probably won't due to lawyers. What really matters is how they apply their policy. In this case, they showed they can be flexible enough to allow someone to break a rule, in defense of their own life, yet to keep their job. That shows good judgment on their part. By keeping the policy in place, they can appeal to their lawyers and to some others.

    I think they made the right choice in light of their own policy. Thumbs up to them.
     
    orygun, Benny503, soberups and 3 others like this.
  5. Joe13

    Joe13
    NW of Vancouver
    Opinionated & Blunt Silver Supporter Bronze Supporter 2015 Volunteer 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    8,019
    Likes Received:
    15,239
    I'd rather be unemployed then dead...
     
    orygun, 3MTA3, fredball and 5 others like this.
  6. soberups

    soberups
    Newberg
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    Likes Received:
    1,442
    Nor will they, due to liability concerns.

    She clearly violated company policy by carrying a gun while working. However...nowhere in their statement is it specified what the consequences are for violating that policy. So maybe they gave her a warning letter, or a write-up. Maybe they docked 5 cents off of her pay. What matters is that they didn't fire her, and it sounds as though they are treating her right, getting her counseling etc. Good for Papa Johns!
     
  7. deen_ad

    deen_ad
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,088
    Likes Received:
    1,311
    < Why they don't have school shootings in Israel.
    Notice the long gun slung over the teachers shoulder?

    I thought this was announced weeks ago.

    Deen
    NRA Life Member, Benefactor Level
    "Defender of Freedom" award
    NRA Golden Eagle member
    WAC member
    Vancouver Rifle and Pistol Club member


    "Having a gun is like a parachute, if you need one and don't have it you may never need it again"
     
    Slobray and fredball like this.
  8. pchewn

    pchewn
    Beaverton Oregon USA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    332
    But how many people who work there don't carry while delivering pizza due to the policy? This is really bad because the policy keeps people from carrying. Some people will choose to carry, get caught, and get fired. Only the RARE person who defies the policy, defends themselves, and gets publicity will not be punished by the policy.
     
  9. NoFlinch

    NoFlinch
    In a van down by the river
    Owner of Cocaine addicted dog.

    Messages:
    1,526
    Likes Received:
    1,361
    .....or maybe by NOT firing her, she is doomed to keeping a dead end job....

    But Kudos to Papa Johns!
     
    Dyjital likes this.
  10. soberups

    soberups
    Newberg
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    Likes Received:
    1,442
    It is a liability issue, nothing more. Papa John's insurance would be unaffordable if they allowed their employees to be armed as a matter of policy. So instead they prohibit it, with the consequences of violating the policy dependent upon the manner in which the gun was used. No different really from Dutch Brothers, the barista down in Eugene who shot and killed an armed robber was in violation of Dutch Brothers "no guns" policy but they didn't fire him either.
     
    Norm0931 and Dyjital like this.
  11. slingshot1943

    slingshot1943
    salem or
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    328
    Why worry about losing a pizza delivery job?
     
  12. soberups

    soberups
    Newberg
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    Likes Received:
    1,442
    That's the whole point.

    If you have a carry permit (like she did) and use the gun in a lawful manner for self defense (like she did) they aren't going to fire you for violating the policy. Sort of like "don't ask don't tell" was for the military.
     
  13. PlayboyPenguin

    PlayboyPenguin
    Pacific Northwest
    Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    4,844
    Likes Received:
    1,785
    Nope, I won't be eating Papa John's just because they are not firing this one employee while everyone is watching. The fact they aren't changing the policy tells me they are just trying to avoid even more boycott's like after the CEO said he favored slightly higher profits over the welfare of his employees (which dropped their national rating from a 35 to a 4). Their pizza is pretty awful and the CEO is a scumbag.
     
    Nick Burkhardt likes this.
  14. slingshot1943

    slingshot1943
    salem or
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    328
    I'm not going to avoid a business unless they are supporters of gun control.
     
    Dyjital likes this.
  15. Nick Burkhardt

    Nick Burkhardt
    NE Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,953
    Likes Received:
    2,505
  16. Riot

    Riot
    Benton County, Washington
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,066
    Likes Received:
    1,798
    It's too bad Corporations have to have this stance...otherwise people would sue the crap out of them!
     
  17. slingshot1943

    slingshot1943
    salem or
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    328
    We need loser pays for lawsuits.
     
    spookshack likes this.

Share This Page