JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
The problem is, then they'll burrow like ticks into the unaccountable Deep State Bureaucracy... ever try to make someone you can't fire do something they've decided they don't wanna do, or stop 'em from doing something they've made up their mind TO do?

Unfortunately you're probably right. In many cases the bureaucrats are a bigger problem than the politicians.
 
dueling+banjos.gif
 
If you read 7 ,8 and 10 , the duelling is the only one they actually obey. Nice they are able to create more work for themselves on our tax dollars. Crap,crap and more crap.
 
Wow... ok I am sure that what piqued my interest in the article is different from others only in if you read to the bottom of the article, they mention a reference to "W. H. Gray as a member of the provincial legislature"

W.H. Gray is my ancestor. Specifically my great, great grandfather. I knew that he was involved in the city of Pasco and later moved to Astoria, but I didn't know he was in the provincial legislature. He also came West with Marcus and Narcissa Whitman and was a skilled carpenter, helping build the Whitman mission site.
 
Oregon Lawmakers Suggest Repealing the Ban on Gun Duels Between Public Officials
  1. Home
  2. Culture Wars
By Lukas Mikelionis| 6:54 am, April 10, 2017

  • <broken link removed> , the constitutional ban in question refers to Article II, section 9 in the Oregon Constitution. It says that anyone who offers, accepts or knowingly participates in a "challenge to fight a duel … or who shall agree to go out of the State to fight a duel, shall be ineligible to any office of trust, or profit."

    The original article was signed back in 1845, when disputes were still frequently resolved with gun duels. Other parts of the country had outlawed them decades before.

    "They decided that it would not be very civil if two members of the Legislature disagreed and then shot each other on the front steps of the provisional capitol," said Republican Sen. Brian Boquist on Wednesday during the committee hearing about repealing the law.

    According to the Senator, however, the article should be repealed because it's outdated and unnecessary in modern times.

  • Because the repeal changes the constitution, Oregon voters would have the final say on whether they want to keep the law. Before then, the bill must also go through the Legislature's approval process. If it passes both chambers, it will be referred to voters.

  • Sen. Boquist also testified that the Oregon Constitution could get away with more changes that no longer serve a purpose in modern times.

    "I want you to know that most of your stationery is probably in violation of the law because we have a constitutional clause as to how we can use our stationery," he said.

    Democratic Sen. Ginny Burdick responded to the bill's possible repeal of a ban on gun duels, saying it's "the bill I've been waiting all session for."

    "Well, I'm deeply disappointed that the ambitions for this bill are bigger than dueling, because I was all set to go," she added.

    Dan Meek, a Portland attorney and Oregon Progressive Party spokesman, opposed the motion saying it would allow politicians to accept challenges to fight duels and there's no need to repeal such "unenforced" laws as it will only cost money to organize a referendum in Oregon.

    "This resolution would allow the candidacies of persons who give or accept challenges to fight duels," Meek wrote to the committee. "Also, there is a cost to removing obviously unenforced and unenforceable provisions in the Oregon Constitution, including the cost of processing and printing this resolution on millions of ballots and processing the results."
 
No politician, where ever located, would ever risk his or her person to defend any position they ever took. That requires actual commitment to something other than accumulating wealth while pretending to serve their constituents.
 
I understand not wanting them to duel each other. Unless they used swords or clubs they might hurt somebody other than their opponent. The members of the Oregon legislature are notoriously liberal and most of them have no idea how to use a firearm. Who knows who they might shoot. It would of course be an entertaining video. If they were armed with single shot dueling pistols, How many reloads do you suppose it would require to draw blood?
 

Upcoming Events

Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors April 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top