- Messages
- 3,924
- Reactions
- 2,827
You can be cited for "Road Rage" for flipping off anyone from a motor vehicle.
Ridiculous.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can be cited for "Road Rage" for flipping off anyone from a motor vehicle.
You can be cited for "Road Rage" for flipping off anyone from a motor vehicle.
Nobody's whining - just expressing pragmatic opinions about an incredibly stupid display.Whiners not allowed.
Two words describe this:
Stupid and immature
Yeah..it comes under Disorderly Conduct or Harassment.
166.025 Disorderly conduct in the second degree. (1) A person commits the crime of disorderly conduct in the second degree if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, the person:
(a) Engages in fighting or in violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior;
166.065 Harassment. (1) A person commits the crime of harassment if the person intentionally:
(a) Harasses or annoys another person by:
(A) Subjecting such other person to offensive physical contact; or
(B) Publicly insulting such other person by abusive words or gestures in a manner intended and likely to provoke a violent response;
Pretty sure they could hang one of these on you pretty easy, based upon who instigates a response to the flipper. Burt Gummer posts says it pretty well. Do your best to have as little interaction with LEO and government in general as possible. This will be just one more entry in your online file. Flipping one the bird is just asking for it. You deserve what you get.
I know, I flipped a bus driver the bird after he cut me off about 40 years ago. Got cited for Disorderly Conduct. Cost me $ 170 back then. Smart a** 17 year old I was back in those days. I deserved it.
An op-ed in a local paper or publication would be a much more prudent way to voice his grievances.
Is it illegal to flip off an officer?
How was it "obvious" that he wasn't speeding? Not arguing, just asking.Look, he was stupid, but he was not speeding. That's obvious. The cop LIED to get him on a "contempt of cop" citation. You can say the cop was justified if you want, but the cop still PERJURED himself because of a perceived personal offense.
That cop should be thanking his lucky stars that the dumb jerk wasn't packing audio/video and telemetry to prove that he wasn't violating any law.
I don't poke the bear either, but we have to get over this undeserved cop-mystique. They're public servants with arrest powers, NOTHING MORE.
How do you know if the guy was speeding or not? Why come down on the deputy, when you have no idea if the guy was or was not speeding?Look, he was stupid, but he was not speeding. That's obvious. The cop LIED to get him on a "contempt of cop" citation. You can say the cop was justified if you want, but the cop still PERJURED himself because of a perceived personal offense.
That cop should be thanking his lucky stars that the dumb jerk wasn't packing audio/video and telemetry to prove that he wasn't violating any law.
I don't poke the bear either, but we have to get over this undeserved cop-mystique. They're public servants with arrest powers, NOTHING MORE.