- Messages
- 351
- Reactions
- 547
NAW that's about average for a hooker. So she's not that hot.
Join the #1 community for gun owners of the Northwest
We believe the 2nd Amendment is best defended through grass-roots organization, education, and advocacy centered around individual gun owners. It is our mission to encourage, organize, and support these efforts throughout Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming.
Already a member? Log InFree Membership Benefits
Fewer ads
Discuss firearms and all aspects of firearm ownership
Join others in organizing against anti-gun legislation
Buy, sell, and trade in our classified section
Find nearby gun shops, ranges, training, and other resources
Discover free outdoor shooting areas
Stay up to date on firearm-related events
Share photos and video with other members
...and much more!
Discuss firearms and all aspects of firearm ownership
Join others in organizing against anti-gun legislation
Buy, sell, and trade in our classified section
Find nearby gun shops, ranges, training, and other resources
Discover free outdoor shooting areas
Stay up to date on firearm-related events
Share photos and video with other members
...and much more!
OFF's legal fee's Dine & Dash
- Thread Starter Flymph
- Start date
-
- Tags
- dash firearms measure 114
- Messages
- 1,953
- Reactions
- 5,579
The attorney has been practicing 30 years. Here is his discipline record from the Oregon State Bar:
Disciplinary History▲ |
| Date | Sanctions | Details | Source |
| No Disciplinary Sanctions for this Member |
- Messages
- 150
- Reactions
- 199
Please tell us how a law suit filed and a matter of public record is somehow 'fake news"?
Are the court's records also 'fake'?
- Messages
- 2,127
- Reactions
- 4,401
You do realize how difficult it is for an attorney to have disciplinary sanctions applied? Unless they misuse funds held in trust, they almost never receive sanctions.
The law firm and lawyer is not representing OFF.
The rest of the article heavily implies OFF failed to pay legal fees, but fails to mention the lawyer was fired back in early December after only a few days of employment, also public record.
- Messages
- 150
- Reactions
- 199
The article isn't 'implying". It's quoting the lawsuit filed against OFF for nonpayment. I suspect there is a lot more to this story.
then why didnt it include public information that the lawyer hasnt worked for OFF since last December? Theres 2 sides to the story and intentionally only sharing one side when they know about the other is "implying".
- Messages
- 806
- Reactions
- 1,679
Great! Which lawyer did you hire to represent us in court???
OFF's legal fee's Dine & Dash
https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2023/01/oregon-firearms-federation-owes-thousands-in-legal-fees-for-challenge-of-measure-114-lawyer-says-in-suit.htmlwww.northwestfirearms.com
They haven’t and they won’t get any money from me.
- Messages
- 806
- Reactions
- 1,679
Please note that Amazon Smile is going away, so you’ll have to support them directly.
- Messages
- 806
- Reactions
- 1,679
Makes me wonder why folks on this site are so quick to trust the “media”…
- Messages
- 5,997
- Reactions
- 11,948
- Messages
- 3,598
- Reactions
- 3,518
Sending to off regardless!
- Thread Starter
- #73
- Messages
- 7,884
- Reactions
- 22,014
Lawyers, am I right?
- Messages
- 1,812
- Reactions
- 3,211
"For 30 years, John Kaempf has successfully defended civil litigation in the state and federal courts of Oregon and Washington. He specializes in defending lawsuits against churches and religious schools, as well as child sex abuse claims. He also defends catastrophic personal injury lawsuits for insurers. He has tried over 30 cases to a verdict, a rarity in his generation of civil defense trial attorneys. He has also defended dozens of child sex abuse cases against churches and individuals, including one of the largest child sex abuse cases in the country, which involved over 70 plaintiffs suing a private school. He is one of the few defense lawyers who has tried a civil child sex abuse case to a jury. The case favorably settled after two weeks of trial when the plaintiff's case did not go well."
One of the reasons I own firearms is to protect my family. I can't support an organization that is in bed with a guy who protects pedophiles. Screw Keven Starrett and OFF
One of the reasons I own firearms is to protect my family. I can't support an organization that is in bed with a guy who protects pedophiles. Screw Keven Starrett and OFF
Did you catch the part where Kevin fired the guy?
- Messages
- 7,677
- Reactions
- 12,867
But why did he hire him knowing his background and knowing he has no experience in 2A cases? Makes no sense. Something doesn't add up here Imo. I'm not saying the financial contentions by either side are right or wrong, I know nothing about that. Just saying it makes no sense to hire a guy who specializes in defending pedophiles for a 2A case. Doesn't add up (to my way of thinking anyway).
I mean wouldn't it turn your stomach? Or at the very least if you wanted to win wouldn't you hire an attorney with 2A experience?
That I don't know and a good question. I've never had to hire an attorney so I cant imagine how difficult the vetting would be.
- Messages
- 7,677
- Reactions
- 12,867
Most if not all specialize in a certain type of law because like most things you can't be an expert in everything. For example for a patent case you would hire an attorney that knows about patent law.
makes me wonder then what it would be like to find a pro gun rights attorney in Oregon?
Similar threads
