Reports are that the overwhelming majority of people who testified were in opposition.
So we have more democrats imposing there messiahs agenda on everyone, just like Colorado. No cares at all what their constituents think,,,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reports are that the overwhelming majority of people who testified were in opposition.
That's not what it's about. It's about control and revenue. That's it.Does anyone understand how any of these new ordinances will actually prevent a criminal from committing a crime? That's what I don't understand.
Every gun owner in the state should go out and get a CHL.
No. People with CHLs are uneffected. There are a LOT of CHLs in the Portland area. Last Summer, the GAO reported that about 5.1% of adults had CHLs in Oregon, which translated to 147,000 of them. That was about 1/20, and it has increased substantially. Because of the difference in local regulation between Portland metro area and more distant counties, and based on what I see on a daily basis through work, I'd guess that there are about 120,000 CHLs in the Portland metro area, and climbing rapidly.
My lady and I were wrapping up Christmas shopping at Washington Square a few days after the CTC shooting, and I saw at least 20 people who I know carry on a daily basis.
Thank you state for granting me this permission.
It isn't right, and I'm not standing for it. How do we fight this?
I have and it was worthless. To have your rights infringed in your own town and county really sucks.
In the intended use of the words, "to bear" (according to the 7th Circuit Court, and the SCOTUS, interpreting the words of the forefathers)...
yes.
It wasn't worthless when Oregon legislators backed off of the worst State proposals and used the "this should be done at the Federal level" cop out, or when it came out that the Senate couldn't get support for the Federal bills. It should be painfully obvious that political pressure from lobbying groups and persistent & outspoken voters are the reasons why we do not currently have a new Assault Weapons Ban in place, universal background checks, firearms registration, etc.
By being loud and determined, we (the firearms community) scared legislators with votes and dollars. We won the most recent battles.
If we continue to be outspoken and passionate, and if we continue to show the fence sitters what we're about, we will continue to win.
15.065 Discharge of a Firearm.
(A) It is unlawful for any person to fire or discharge a firearm within the boundaries of the County.
(B) The prohibition of subsection (A) of this section does not apply to or affect those listed in ORS 166.171(2).
15.064 Possession of a Loaded Firearm in a Public Place.
(A) It is unlawful for any person in a public place, to carry a firearm upon the person, or while in a vehicle in a public place, unless all ammunition has been removed from the chamber and from the cylinder, clip, or magazine. A person who violates this section is subject to penalty even if the person did not know that ammunition was in the cylinder, chamber, clip or magazine.