OFF alert

Messages
2,274
Reactions
769
This is outrageous..!!


1.jpg
Oregon's Only No Compromise Gun Rights Organization
.
06.27.14
Governor Kitzhaber Gears Up For Universal Background Checks In 2015


OFF recently learned that the Oregon State Police have a new policy dealing with firearms purchase denials. Gun dealers in Oregon were sent a letterfrom the State Police telling them of a revision in OSP policy and stating: "This revision will include enforcement action involving persons attempting an unlawful firearms transfer through a licensed firearm dealer, during a voluntary private party check or a background check at a gun show." We were also informed thatthe State Police had sent a bulletin to troopers informing them of this policy, but were unable to acquire a copy until now.You can see that bulletin here.


Note that the bulletin says the following:
(Emphasis added.)
FICS will report the Denial of a Firearm Transaction to OSP Dispatch.
The incident will be dispatched as a call for service,including suspect name,dealer location,and reason for denial. Sworn personnel will respond and take appropriate enforcement action.
After enforcement is completed, OSP personnel will clear the CAD call with a reportable clearance code.
Investigative consideration- The statutes above require you to prove the suspect"knowingly"was aware they are not qualified for these transactions. The suspect's culpable mental state will need to be determined.

OFF has now spoken to two persons who attempted firearms purchases, were denied and had State Troopers dispatched to "investigate."


In the first instance, this Wednesday, a buyer was attempting to purchase a pistol and the dealer received a notice of a "delay" on his computer terminal.

Oddly, the "delay" provided no estimate of when the OSP expected to have the issue resolved, so the dealer called OSP and was told "We are working on it." The dealer asked the customer to wait (hoping for an approval)and then a State Trooper arrived looking for the customer.

The trooper took the customer to the parking lot for an "investigation" where the trooper explained he did not know the specific reason for the denial. He was only told the customer had a "Federal ping" for mental health issues. The customer told the trooper that he had never been involuntarily committed as the law requires for such a denial.

We were told by both the dealer and the customer that the trooper was professional and apologetic for the intrusion and was clearly not comfortable being pulled off patrol for this "call for service."


The trooper reported that the new rule came directly from the Governor. The customer was not arrested or further detained. No action was taken against him but he was denied the purchase.


A similar event took place yesterday. A customer attempted a purchase and was denied.


The customer had no idea why, as he had purchased firearms in the past and even had had a concealed handgun license.


After leaving the store, a State Trooper came to the business looking for the customer. The trooper then went to the home of the customer.

The trooper told the customer that he did not know why he had been dispatched and had no record of any criminal history of the "suspect."
Again, the report from the denied party was that the trooper was professional and apologetic for the intrusion and that the trooper informed him that this new policy was directly from the Governor.

Again, there was no arrest, and no action was taken against the customer. But of course, once again a State Trooper was removed from patrol to "investigate" a person who was attempting to purchase a firearm when there was no evidence that the buyer was attempting an illegal purchase.


We believe this policy is a prelude to another attempt to require universal background checks in the coming legislative session.

You will recall that when Floyd Prozanski attempted to pass this in 2014, he was ridiculed because it was well known that when a person failed a background check as the result of past felonies there was virtually never any police action or prosecutions. So, to respond to that criticism and lay the ground work for a new bill, the Governor has ordered State Police to leave patrols to respond to every denial, no matter how unjustified.

The two buyers we spoke to were lucky. They were not hauled off to jail pending completion of an "investigation." But both had to deal with the embarrassment of being detained and questioned by the State Police. (One in front of his children.)


This new policy illuminates the failures in the background check system and is nothing more than another politically motivated attack on gun owners. Furthermore, it's an outrageous misuse of scarce police resources. The State Police have long complained about being understaffed. Now they are being dragged off of traffic patrols to enforce what at very least should be handled by local cops.

Please remember, if you become the subject of one of these "investigations" you are not required to answer any questions without the advice of a lawyer.
 

BillM

Messages
1,548
Reactions
1,710
Well---that's interesting. It sort of sounds like maybe they are going to actually go after and
prosecute people that try to purchase and are not allowed to purchase for whatever reason.
Not sure that is a bad thing----felons etc that are denied after they lied on a 4473 should
be arrested!

The other side of the coin is that there are pile of denials/delays that are for BS reasons.
Similar name, system overload, whatever. Sounds like it will put a pretty heavy load on
OSP--and they are far from overstaffed.
 
Messages
2,676
Reactions
3,477
I agree with you 100% Bill. There was a previous thread on this, but questions remained as to if a redress number was issued and the final outcome. I fully agree that there needs to be an investigation, but there also needs to be rapid resolution of problems caused by errors in the system.
 
Messages
2,376
Reactions
4,730
The creep from Salem would sooner have a sloooooow resolution. First it takes additional manpower which allows said creep to add more coppers and blab that the hold-up is because unqualified people are jamming the system. 2nd, slow resolution may have a tendency to dissuade law abiding people from buying firearms . . .

If you don't believe that is in his liberal pea brain. You are foolish indeed.

Sheldon
 

WillametteWill

Messages
924
Reactions
2,307
Good to hear the troopers were professional...and dimed off the Governor for the new policy. I agree with other posts that it is good to actually catch bad guys trying to buy guns illegally, but you cannot just send an officer with no info and say investigate when they have no information regarding the reason for the refusal. For one thing it is not safe for the officers. After the first 100 when nothing happens I would hate to have one of the officers walk into a situation with an armed felon trying to buy another gun.

Once again, politicians not thinking out the ramifications of a policy before it is put in place.
 

FortRock

Messages
821
Reactions
1,052
Good to hear the troopers were professional...and dimed off the Governor for the new policy. I agree with other posts that it is good to actually catch bad guys trying to buy guns illegally, but you cannot just send an officer with no info and say investigate when they have no information regarding the reason for the refusal. For one thing it is not safe for the officers. After the first 100 when nothing happens I would hate to have one of the officers walk into a situation with an armed felon trying to buy another gun.

Once again, politicians not thinking out the ramifications of a policy before it is put in place.
The natural evolution of this will be acquiring Federal funds to create regional 4 or 6-man "rapid response teams" to go out every time there is a delay or denial. These occur daily. RRT's would eliminate the officer safety issue and prevent taking our road guys off patrol. I agree with investigating bad guys trying to have guns, but they rarely attempt buying guns through legal means. Tough balancing act, but it is a bit difficult to trust our "politicians".
 

ZigZagZeke

Messages
5,157
Reactions
12,049
The natural evolution of this will be acquiring Federal funds to create regional 4 or 6-man "rapid response teams" to go out every time there is a delay or denial. These occur daily. RRT's would eliminate the officer safety issue and prevent taking our road guys off patrol.
I can see it now. An MRAP pulls up in front of the gun store and 6 black-clad storm troopers pile out, get in formation, and batter down the gun store's front door, while another team covers the back door. Next come the flash-bangs and 187 rounds fired at random into the shop. Once the scene is secured and it's safe for officers to enter, they won't even have to question anybody. It'll be a moot point.
 

FortRock

Messages
821
Reactions
1,052
at least flash-bangs and a little gas....and Justice will have been served....peace and dignity of the State of Oregon... (reference Markus Bracken....Foreign And Domestic)....
 

FortRock

Messages
821
Reactions
1,052
actually....it is a new "policy" based on existing law. Timing is interesting though. I think it was a feel good response to the Troutdale school incident.
 
Messages
287
Reactions
119
The Governor is looking for a case to prosecute as an example for the new law.
Maybe the tables should get turned a little bit. How about prosecuting HIM for violating the law himself, namely ORS 181.400:

"181.400 Interference with personal and property rights of others. No member of the state police shall in any way interfere with the rights or property of any person, except for the prevention of crime, or the capture or arrest of persons committing crimes. [Amended by 1971 c.467 §25; 1991 c.145 §1]"

An officer who is told by the Governor to go "interfere" with a gun transaction without "probable cause" to believe there is a crime to prevent, is being told by the governor to go break the law. Is this actionable? It sure looks like it when you look at Article 1, Section 22 of the Oregon Constitution:

"Section 22. Suspension of operation of laws. The operation of the laws shall never be suspended, except by the Authority of the Legislative Assembly."

Maybe the State Police should express their apologies to those they have wrongfully "interfered" with by going down and knocking on the Governor's office door to investigate his overt violation of 181.400. The governor should also be afraid of a jury if they are informed of their rights as jurors under Article 1, Section 16 (see underlined emphasis):

"Section 16. Excessive bail and fines; cruel and unusual punishments; power of jury in criminal case. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed. Cruel and unusual punishments shall not be inflicted, but all penalties shall be proportioned to the offense.—In all criminal cases whatever, the jury shall have the right to determine the law, and the facts under the direction of the Court as to the law, and the right of new trial, as in civil cases."

Article 1 of the Oregon Constitution is Oregon's "Bill of Rights". Notice how Oregon jurors not only have a civic duty to "determine the law", but a "right" to "determine the law". When was the last time anyone on this site served as a juror and was informed by the judge that the jury gets to "determine the law"?
 
Last edited:

parallax

Messages
1,274
Reactions
1,717
this needs to be stopped, or its going to have a negative impact on gun stores. nobody is going to want to get hassled if they want to buy a gun. and business for gun stores is going to dry up… just like the governor is planning.
 

UPCOMING EVENTS

Lead Farm Precision Rifle Match
The Lead Farm
34006 Gwinn Rd, Prosser, WA 99350, USA
Arms Collectors of SW Washington Gun Show
Battleground Community Center
912 E Main St, Battle Ground, WA 98604, USA
Rimfire Challenge Dec 12th @ DRRC
Douglas Ridge Rifle Club
27787 OR-224, Eagle Creek, OR 97022, USA
Albany Rifle & Pistol Club (ARPC) Gun Show
Linn County Expo Center
3700 Knox Butte Rd E, Albany, OR 97322, USA

LATEST RESOURCE REVIEWS

  • Gun Pro Shooting Supplies
    5.00 star(s)
    Great Little Shop!
    I went in the place several weeks ago while visiting my kid at school. I ended up buying a new set of electronic ear muffs as my old ones were...
  • Gun Pro Shooting Supplies
    5.00 star(s)
    My go-to
    Neil has been nothing but professional, helpful and fair since I was a brand new shooter. He and his staff treat everyone with respect and you...
  • Northwest Armory - Tigard
    1.00 star(s)
    Completely unhappy!
    Not happy, customer service is highly lacking, and the male employees are rude. We wont be back!!
  • Wildcat Mountain
    4.00 star(s)
    Wildcat Mountain Nov. 30
    Went there today, it was accessible but bad conditions which I kind of expected. Melting snow, mud, etc. No one there and I didn't see a lot of...
  • Gator's Custom Guns
    5.00 star(s)
    Best true Gun shop ive been in for some time
    Cool stuff in stock rather than the top 10 at corporate box stores They moved to a larger place I have to go back and spend more money. I like to...
Top Bottom