NYT article on Times Square terrorist's gun

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by ZachS, May 6, 2010.

  1. ZachS

    ZachS
    Eugene/PDX
    Active Member

    Messages:
    1,118
    Likes Received:
    11
    This is one of the stupidest things I've ever read.


    I think there's something in there about how it's capable to seeking out and killing innocent children without any operator input whatsoever.


    Oh, also this graphic showing some features that lead to its deadly power:

    06gun-1-popup.jpg



    :angry:
     
  2. Tactical SS

    Tactical SS
    Washington
    Member

    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    19
    An early NYT article said it was a fully automatic rifle, and a highly unusual rifle that took handgun rounds.

    Odd because it's not that unusual and rifle rounds are more suited to do more damage. They are playing this "military style" gun up way to much. How it can be fired as quickly as one can pull the trigger and that it automatically loads the next round.

    "he possessed a weapon that could have easily done extreme damage, one rapidly fired round at a time."

    I can only imagine if he had an AR or AK.
     
  3. SonicBlue03

    SonicBlue03
    Snohomish
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,239
    Likes Received:
    425
    My kitchen knives are more dependably lethal than his bomb.

    That link was humorous in a depressing sort of way. Thanks for posting it, though.
     
  4. elsullo

    elsullo
    Portland Oregon
    New Member

    Messages:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    55
    Are their editorial cartoonists still drawing rifles with the magazines in backward? Idiots, trying to keep other idiots frightened. New York City already has more police per-capita than any other American city to keep the crime rate down. Lord Mayor Bloomberg detests guns, except for the ones carried by his two full-time city-paid bodyguards who travel with him EVERYWHERE......................elsullo
     
  5. 8ball

    8ball
    WA
    Quit talkin' and start chalking!

    Messages:
    977
    Likes Received:
    225
    At least that article was more informative than the NY Post photo tour of the terrorists kitchen cupboard. :laugh:
     
  6. matt_w

    matt_w
    Hillsboro, OR
    Active Member

    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    59
    So its long and bulky like a rifle, but does less damage than a rifle. It seems like a (smarter) terrorist would choose a REAL rifle if he wanted to carry out something malicious rather than a handgun.
     
  7. stonedkirby

    stonedkirby
    WA (Clark/Cowlitz)
    Member

    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    0
    depressing...i moved from NYC not long ago...glad to be out of there
     
  8. deen_ad

    deen_ad
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,088
    Likes Received:
    1,312
    excuse for a "news" article!

    How can it be a "fearsome" weapon yet fire low power handgun rounds, one trigger pull at a time? Downplay the good points and play up the bad. Sounds like more newsmedia hype!
     
  9. enjr4

    enjr4
    Renton, WA
    Active Member

    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    73
    All those state and federal folks are breaking their arms patting themselves on the back.

    Only thing I can say is the last two attacks failed because the bad guys messed up and their bombs failed to go boom. There would have been a plane all over the ground and a big mess in New York otherwise.

    Enjr4
     
  10. 1970camaroRS

    1970camaroRS
    Mill Creek, WA
    Member

    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    19
    Ah, politicians and the lack of logic. Like bread and butter.
     
  11. PlayboyPenguin

    PlayboyPenguin
    Pacific Northwest
    Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    4,847
    Likes Received:
    1,808
    Correct me if I am wrong, but what makes this rifle so deadly is the fact that it uses much weaker handgun ammo instead of an actual rifle caliber???

    The story should have read "Suspected Times Square bomber has crappy taste in guns. Owned cheap carbine." :D
     
  12. 56kninja

    56kninja
    Portland
    Member

    Messages:
    458
    Likes Received:
    1
    It folds and it looks scary!!!!!!!! And it shoots handgun ammo that the police carry!!!!!!

    People that dont know about guns think pistols are more powerful. I have a friend in belgium that told me rifles were Ok to be owned but handguns were too powerful and should only be used by police and military...
     
  13. MarkSBG

    MarkSBG
    Beaverton Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,464
    Likes Received:
    41
    OK, PBP, you are wrong. Handguns are more dangerous than rifles. You can tell because handguns are illegal, but rifles are not. Therefore, handgun ammo is more dangerous and more powerful. Handguns also have longer range, are more accurate, and have more knock down power than rifles!

    Come on, its simple logic!

    And, just in case it isn't clear:

    sarcasm+meter.jpg
     
  14. trainsktg

    trainsktg
    Portland OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,666
    Likes Received:
    811
    An unmodified semi-auto Saiga 12 is ownable by civilians in the UK, yet in order to own a rifle, it must be bolt-action. In order for Ar15s and AKs to be legal, they have been neutered requiring the user to cycle the bolt carrier by hand after each shot. Yet the last time I checked, getting hit with a several 1oz slugs or 00 buck in rapid succession would do alot more damage than the same number of 5.56x45 or 5.45x39 rounds would.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzdY1eC6H8k

    Keith
     
  15. smithmax

    smithmax
    here
    Member

    Messages:
    382
    Likes Received:
    12
    I wonder what gun the "multiple extra clips" were for...
     

Share This Page