'**** no' right back at you, Seattle Times

[Dave Workman]

LAS VEGAS — This morning’s Seattle Times editorial “Toning down our loaded debate about guns” argues that firearms owners who had nothing to do with the despicable shooting in Tucson should yield on a proposal to ban extended capacity ammunition magazines.
The Times editorial, supporting legislation introduced Tuesday (H.R 308), essentially demonizes these citizens — tens of thousands of whom reside in the Evergreen State, including a fair number who are here in Las Vegas at the annual SHOT Show — as “hell no” obstructionists. Well, since the Times is okay with using street vernacular, you’re damned right they are, and what’s more, they ought to be.


<broken link removed>

Or try this:

<broken link removed>

Read More

 

[clearconscience]

The only thing I hate more than the people that wish to take away my arms (any kind) is the absurd media that agressively promotes such propaganda.

As an American, as a free man. I should be able to own a black rifle, a 30rd mag, heck even a tank if I can afford it.

 

[dario541]

If the news media's Rights were infringed one tenth as much as the gun owners' Rights are, they would be screaming to high heaven!

 

[jyerxa]

Yeah, I just don't see how so many other folks don't see how whack o the news media is. I'm just dumb founded. They are to busy supporting the bad guys and illegals.

Twisted justice.