- Messages
- 5,749
- Reactions
- 18,149
Read and acknowledged. Thanks for the link, BTW. One of my friends wrote the data as 2016-05-23 (and mentioned how he was doing it in proper ISO format, unlike the other people who signed it), but the proper format is mm/dd/yyyy, so I'm thinking I probably need to have him correct that and initial it, or his signature might not count.
Thanks again.
Yes, they look at a handful of the turned in signatures, probably a few hundred, and extrapolate the rest. That's how the Prozanski recall lost. So the actual signatures dont really count, just how many fabricated errors they can find. The names have to be completely readable and exactly the same as the voter registration otherwise they get thrown out. The secretary of state is not unbiased when counting signatures. They are looking for errors when counting signatures and that is all.