- Messages
- 668
- Reactions
- 242
It was pointed out in the article and by several members that the $40K for the truck was in no way a consideration for any damages resulting from the shooting by the LAPD. Yet folks kept commenting how that was a poor settlement and bringing in all sorts or rationalizations for such stupidity. I understand some people not understanding my post. It just strikes as similar to the P&VP rendering 'Factual' information about 'Assault rifles'. Not everybody takes time to read and fully understand what they are casting judgement (personal opinion) on. Even this thought was introduced by another poster, from which my post was a followup to.