Quantcast
  1. Sign up now and join over 35,000 northwest gun owners. It's quick, easy, and 100% free!

New York times op ed

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by rlgdestroyu, Dec 8, 2015.

  1. rlgdestroyu

    rlgdestroyu Free Republic of Everett Member

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    71
  2. nammac

    nammac I-5 Corridor - West of Portland Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    2,129
    Likes Received:
    5,361
    Typical waste of column space by the Times... Spewing their liberal venom...

    Why do Americans who don't believe in the right to self protection call the Police when they are robbed or attacked? Isn't that how they want society???

    Just sayin'
     
  3. rlgdestroyu

    rlgdestroyu Free Republic of Everett Member

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    71
    I see your point. Taking responsibility for oneself and actions doesn't rate very high on some people's list. I mean no one is forcing anyone to carry or own firearms but these same people want to force us to relinquish ours.....but they don't see the hypocrisy.
     
    Slobray and nammac like this.
  4. ZA_Survivalist

    ZA_Survivalist Oregon AK's all day.

    Messages:
    4,649
    Likes Received:
    5,749
    I dont want to suffer a rage related aneurysm by reading the anti firearm comments.

    Those folks have no idea how the world really works. I hope to god they learn one day, at their own cost.

    They have traded their freedom for "security" and look how far that has got them. Their DNA shouldnt be allowed to continue into the gene pool. That kind of stupid is hereditary.
     
    etrain16, rlgdestroyu and B5Ben like this.
  5. 3MTA3

    3MTA3 DMZ between Liberty and Tyranny Behind Enemy Lines Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes Received:
    5,606
    "If everyone at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino had been armed and firing, the result would have been an even more chaotic situation in which police would not have known whom to target. Many more lives might have been lost in the crossfire."

    If everyone had been armed it would have been over by the time the Police got there. Instead of 14 dead and even more wounded and then having to chase down the terrorists exposing even more to danger there would have been two terrorists dead and far fewer dead and wounded victims when they arrived at the scene.

    That's IF they decided to chose a hard target. If they knew they would be facing deadly force they would have picked a much softer target in a gun free zone.

    I wonder how many of the victims would have felt less safe with a gun to protect themselves with when the shooting started?

    What a total fcuknig idiot.
     
  6. 3MTA3

    3MTA3 DMZ between Liberty and Tyranny Behind Enemy Lines Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes Received:
    5,606
    I couldn't hold back and replied in the comments section. Turns out your comment has to be approved to be posted. Care to guess the odds that my comment will ever be seen? LOL
     
    rlgdestroyu and U201491 like this.
  7. B5Ben

    B5Ben Boise Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    669
    You're more likely to pick the winner of the Super Bowl, the final score, and the teams that play in it for the next decade.
     
    rlgdestroyu and 3MTA3 like this.
  8. rlgdestroyu

    rlgdestroyu Free Republic of Everett Member

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    71
    I thought about commenting, but the whole pearls before swine thing.
     
    3MTA3 likes this.