National New news about pistol braces

[StacattoP]

Newly revealed documents show ATF gave conflicting approval for pistol braces

The letter fails to acknowledge conflicting reports that ATF officials had given SB Tactical the go-ahead to proceed with the development of new braces based on ATF's initial decision letter.

www.ammoland.com

Read More

 

[3MTA3]

Good analysis here

Personally I have separated the upper and lower on my pistol and have at least temporarily removed my SBA-3.

I think I'm going to SBR that lower and go with a regular stock. Question now is what happens if/when SBR's become illegal in Oregon?

 

[jdub75]

the decision is regarding a shotgun, which cannot be a pistol evidently.

 

[Tony617]

You can skip ahead to time: 5.34.

 

[bikemutt]

Good analysis here

Personally I have separated the upper and lower on my pistol and have at least temporarily removed my SBA-3.

I think I'm going to SBR that lower and go with a regular stock. Question now is what happens if/when SBR's become illegal in Oregon?

I SBRd mine years ago, right after WA legalized SBRs, never was a fan of the brace. Back then, I never imagined WA would legalize SBRs, figured I'd see pigs learn to fly first. Unless SBRs start showing up at crime scenes, I can't imagine OR wanting to ban them just because they can. Heck, you lucky ones can own machineguns

 

[3MTA3]

I SBRd mine years ago, right after WA legalized SBRs, never was a fan of the brace. Back then, I never imagined WA would legalize SBRs, figured I'd see pigs learn to fly first. Unless SBRs start showing up at crime scenes, I can't imagine OR wanting to ban them just because they can. Heck, you lucky ones can own machineguns

I mainly don't like engraving my name as the "manufacturer" on the receiver, so it looks like I need to set up a trust to avoid that. The paperwork and fee aren't all that big a deal.