- Messages
- 1,939
- Reactions
- 2,798
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree, it's not groundbreaking. However, it's around $500 cheaper than a similar Stacatto. Hopefully, the build quality is similar.Absolutely groundbreaking! Heavy sarcasm off. Yawn……
Right...because 2011's have been out for almost 20 years. Then there's the amazing double stack "1911-like" variants that Wilson Combat has put out. But this Springfield is the one that's going to make Mr. Browning roll over.If I want a high capacity 9mm 1911 i will buy a FN hi power. A 1911 is supposed to 45acp or 38 Super. This is not a 1911 and it is not for me. IMHO. I wonder If Mr. Browning is rolling over.
1911s are not polymer guns and a BHP is closer to a traditional 1911 than this hi capacity plastic wonder isRight...because 2011's have been out for almost 20 years. Then there's the amazing double stack "1911-like" variants that Wilson Combat has put out. But this Springfield is the one that's going to make Mr. Browning roll over.
Not to mention that Browning was an innovator, inventor, entrepreneur, etc. Not only are the odds high that he would think 2011's were cool, my bet is that he would have built it himself had he lived long enough. It's a shame we will never know.
Lastly, Hi Powers are cool. But they are not 1911's. That's
I have a staccato C2, P and XC, I can tell you that the springer I just bought isn't even in the same league. Not in trigger, fit and finish nothing.Well I can't seem to find the review I read on this but the reviewer thought the Staccatos looked better, the fit and finish on the Springfield was at least as good as the Staccato, and he thought the trigger on the Springer was actually better.
Springfield has a lot of experience with 1911's so it's possible the trigger is better. Will be interested to see what others have to say.