National Firearms Reciprocity Bill Just Introduced

Discussion in 'Defensive Carry & Self Defense' started by billdeserthills, Jan 4, 2017.

Tags:
  1. billdeserthills

    billdeserthills
    Cave Creek, Arizony
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,939
    Likes Received:
    1,317
    Gun Owners of America just messaged me about a Concealed Carry reciprocity bill that has been introduced by Congressman Richard Hudson. Please go to www.gunowners.org

    and click on the GOA Backs Reciprocity Bill
     
    Baseacegoku, nammac and v0lcom13sn0w like this.
  2. JRuby

    JRuby
    St. Helens Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,771
    Likes Received:
    2,503
    I question the logic as it might turn out the federal government may make having or getting a permit very difficult.
     
    mjbskwim likes this.
  3. billdeserthills

    billdeserthills
    Cave Creek, Arizony
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,939
    Likes Received:
    1,317
    While I'm generally opposed to this subject due to my fear that the gov't will wind up with my name on a list, the benefits of this vastly outweigh my fears. Look at all the people killed in some cities, We the People need more rights, dammit
     
    mjbskwim and nammac like this.
  4. CountryGent

    CountryGent
    Southern Oregon
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    1,906
    Likes Received:
    4,753
    Interesting. The actual text of the bill may be read here. I just printed a hardcopy to review it in its entirety and will withhold further comment until then. Thanks for the heads up.
     
    jrd541280, NoLimePlease and SKrueger like this.
  5. Oregon Quartermaster

    Oregon Quartermaster
    SE Portland
    Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    1,782
    Likes Received:
    3,718
    What federal hurdles are there in getting a drivers license? If all they do is say you have to attend a safety class, and pass an exam (practical/written), I don't see the downside. The Arizona class, when I was stationed there was 16 hours over two days with a qualification shoot. Oregon was a two hour stitch 'n bubblegum that answered no ones questions. Our instructor wasted time talking about home defense shotguns and pepper spray.
     
  6. SKrueger

    SKrueger
    SW Washington
    Platinum Supporter Platinum Supporter 2017 Volunteer

    Messages:
    4,043
    Likes Received:
    15,532
    (other than a machinegun or destructive device)

    Is it just me or does that phrase kinda leaves things open ended? :rolleyes: Some of those wing nuts see a BB gun as a destructive device and would probably shoot there eye out if they ever used one.
     
    jrd541280 likes this.
  7. JRuby

    JRuby
    St. Helens Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,771
    Likes Received:
    2,503
    According to the Constitution this falls under the control of the state's not the federal government. Personally I don't want the federal government to have any say in comtroling my 2A rights. I don't trust them.
     
    eightyeight mag and wired like this.
  8. billdeserthills

    billdeserthills
    Cave Creek, Arizony
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,939
    Likes Received:
    1,317
    That was awhile back, now in AZ it's an 8 hr class & no shooting
     
  9. Dungannon

    Dungannon
    Vancouver
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter 2016 Volunteer 2017 Volunteer

    Messages:
    691
    Likes Received:
    2,159
    Thanks.

    On first reading, I'm impressed. Presentation of a carry permit is prima facie evidence, the prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the individual did not meet the conditions set out in law, and if you prevail against prosecution the court shall award reasonable attorney fees.

    No picture identification on Washington State license to carry concealed pistol, so I suppose that is a loophole for some states to drag their feet in providing identification sufficient under this proposed legislation. But then we know it will always be a state by state battle to secure recognition of our inherent right. No federal bureaucracy or process in this legislation - like a drivers license they have to recognize what other states issue.
     
    CountryGent likes this.
  10. Hawaiian

    Hawaiian
    Tigard Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,629
    Likes Received:
    2,763
    Where this bill will get the most resistance, is the part that reads, "is entitled to carry a concealed firearm in the State in which the person resides". This would allow those in constitutional carry states with no permit or background check to carry in other states.
    For this bill to pass, we will need a few Dems to vote for it. This section may scare them off.
     
  11. nammac

    nammac
    I-5 Corridor - West of Portland
    Constitutionalist Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    3,676
    Likes Received:
    11,641
    It'll be interesting to see what happens with this bill... I view the right to bear arms to be a civil right, God given, but nonetheless a civil right. I've encouraged my Representative to support this bill and my civil rights... Don't expect that to happen, but who knows, stranger things have happened...
     
    jrd541280 and SKrueger like this.
  12. Who The F R U

    Who The F R U
    Rainier Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    556
    Likes Received:
    729
    Who was the original a-hole that thought we needed a permit?
    The God given right thing to self defense as a human trumps any word's on paper.
    I've carried since I was in my teen's never had a permit never will.

    I don't ask permission to live as a free man.
     
    nammac likes this.
  13. Diamondback

    Diamondback
    Crapper Gunsmith
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    9,555
    I would've preferred a Second Amendment Clarification Act saying "the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear shall not be infringed by Congress or the States or anybody!"

    Granted, that leaves a limbo for LPR's and other non-citizens here legally, but... start with those our Constitution and laws are most intended to protect first.
     
  14. Ralgha

    Ralgha
    Portland
    Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    403
    Likes Received:
    588
    This bill defines magazines and ammo as part of the handgun, and thus appears to supercede state magazine capacity limits (for handguns). I can cut and paste the relevant text from the bill once I crawl out of bed.
     
  15. Ralgha

    Ralgha
    Portland
    Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    403
    Likes Received:
    588
    Full text can be found at https://hudson.house.gov/uploads/Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017.pdf

    This is the part that defines a handgun as including the magazine and ammo, perhaps it will supercede state magazine capacity limits? I'm not sure.

    It also appears to allow carry into school zones in any state (provided the state doesn't have their own gun free school laws) since U.S.C. 922(q) contains the prohibitions on carrying in schools.

    Track the bill: H.R.38 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a means by which nonresidents of a State whose residents may carry concealed firearms may also do so in the State.

    I like this bill, I hope it passes.
     
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2017
  16. Kristina

    Kristina
    Portland, OR
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter 2016 Volunteer 2017 Volunteer

    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    710
    I was having similar thoughts about this but didn't really know how to phrase it. Isn't it generally a bad thing when the federal government supersedes what an individual state has decided? It sounds like a good idea because it is in our favor, but what if it wasn't?
     
  17. PaulB47

    PaulB47
    Hillsboro
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,248
    Likes Received:
    3,400
    Yep, that's a good question. It is a centralization of power. But it's pretty late to be worrying about that any more.

    No. Elsewhere in the bill, it also requires a license. "Constitutional carry" is not covered in the bill.
     
    CountryGent and billdeserthills like this.
  18. Camelfilter

    Camelfilter
    Salem
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    2,903
    Likes Received:
    6,083
    That's a really nice premise, however I do not want anything to ever risk my livelihood, nor my future arms rights nor do I ever want a roommate named Bubba.
     
    CountryGent and Baseacegoku like this.
  19. Who The F R U

    Who The F R U
    Rainier Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    556
    Likes Received:
    729
    Live how you want and I'll keep doing life my way.:)
     
    Camelfilter likes this.
  20. Ralgha

    Ralgha
    Portland
    Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    403
    Likes Received:
    588
    This bill protects the second amendment, preventing states from restricting it. It's not centralizing power any more than the second amendment does.

    As I read it, it only requires photo identification, NOT a license to carry. It only requires a license to carry if your home state doesn't allow constitutional carry.
     

Share This Page