- Messages
- 205
- Reactions
- 380
I didn't think we'd have this long before the next action on Duncan v. Bonta. I was kind of expecting a ruling there, pushing the 9th circuit's hand on these cases."She [Immergut] said she'll consider whether large-capacity magazines constitute a dramatic technological change from earlier firearms capable of firing more than 10 rounds.""
Well duh... and... so what?? I guess she didn't get the memo that the 2 step interest balancing crapolla is no longer valid... and our 1A rights are limited to quill and paper, hu(?)
"Lawyers for the state who are defending Measure 114 will argue next week that large-capacity magazines aren't covered by the Second Amendment and aren't commonly used for self-defense."
...and we'll just ignore what "use" was determined to mean by the Supreme Court... and limit 2A right to apply only to "self defense" vs. "lawful purposes". That'll work.
We can see where this is going.