Oregon Measure 114 litigation

[arakboss]

Oregon attorney general talks proposed ghost gun ban, Measure 114 lawsuits

Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum unveiled her legislative priorities for 2023, including a bill that would ban ghost guns, after voters passed gun Measure 114 in November — enacting a …

www.google.com

 

[spookshack]

Oregon attorney general talks proposed ghost gun ban, Measure 114 lawsuits

Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum unveiled her legislative priorities for 2023, including a bill that would ban ghost guns, after voters passed gun Measure 114 in November — enacting a …

www.google.com

 

[SonicBlue03]

It’s super interesting to me that state Supremes haven’t touched their request yet one way or another for overturning the TRO. It’s probably the prudent move to not take any action on it whatsoever and let the trial happen, of which they will be paying keen attention to.

 

[jayR]

Something wrong with that ?woman?// shifty eyed.. probably a baby eater.

 

[CZP07]

It's laying the groundwork for a gubernational run in 2026. Hits all the keywords that will get her attention amongst probable constituents.

 

[arakboss]

It's laying the groundwork for a gubernational run in 2026. Hits all the keywords that will get her attention amongst probable constituents.

I didn't hear her talk about Ensure and Depends under garments?

 

[SonicBlue03]

It's laying the groundwork for a gubernational run in 2026. Hits all the keywords that will get her attention amongst probable constituents.

I don't think so. She'll be close to if not 80 when that rolls around. This is pure ideology and frothing emotion from someone who has been empowered by the urban rot in Oregon. Same reason Turd Ferguson has his role in WA state. Although that clown does have his eye on the Governorship.

 

[jayR]

it does want to 'insure' a steady supply of feti

 

[Librarian]

The National Police Association files amicus brief opposing Oregon’s attempt to criminalize law abiding gun owners, National Police Association

INDIANAPOLIS, February 2, 2023 -- The National Police Association (NPA) filed an amicus brief in support of an injunction against Oregon’s Ballot Measure...

nationalpolice.org

The NPA notes that many Sheriff's departments across the Nation (including in Oregon) have announced that they will refuse to enforce the recent wave of weapons restrictions passed in defiance of the U.S. Supreme Court. The NPA believes it is important to support courts in setting bright lines in striking down such laws to avoid placing law enforcement officers in the untenable position of being bound to uphold laws they know are unconstitutional under either their state constitution, the U.S., or both.

See https://nationalpolice.org/main/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/NPAs-Amicus-Memorandum-1-27-23.pdf

 

[ob1]

Did anyone else notice the 10 ROUNDS OR MORE thing in the KOIN clip about Smellin Ellen ? ...(above. 1242)

 

[VinnieBoomBah]

Did anyone else notice the 10 ROUNDS OR MORE thing in the KOIN clip about Smellin Ellen ? ...(above)

I wonder how many heads exploded when they read "10 ROUNDS" and "clip" in the same sentence and it took a few milliseconds to get the context squared away

 

[ob1]

ARGH..BAD KOIN BAD

I need to get my BP meds increased.

 

[jackrv]

Describing ghost guns, Rosenblum says "they're basically un-serialized, undetected weapons – weapons that can be made of plastic, on 3-D printers, or weapons that can be made at home in kits that are obtainable online by anyone, and which up until recently, have not needed, have not been required to have even a serial number on the parts."

I have a Mossberg and a J. Stevens pump without serial numbers. The Mossberg dates from the late 40s or early 50s and the J. Stevens dates from 1916.

So much for weapons that can be made of plastic or on 3-D printers that she is so afraid of.

Jack

 

[Howard1955]

Describing ghost guns, Rosenblum says "they're basically un-serialized, undetected weapons – weapons that can be made of plastic, on 3-D printers, or weapons that can be made at home in kits that are obtainable online by anyone, and which up until recently, have not needed, have not been required to have even a serial number on the parts."

I have a Mossberg and a J. Stevens pump without serial numbers. The Mossberg dates from the late 40s or early 50s and the J. Stevens dates from 1916.

So much for weapons that can be made of plastic or on 3-D printers that she is so afraid of.

Jack

How many BILLIONS of dollar’s worth of weapons were abandoned to the taliban?

But we’re having to put up with this nonsense.

Nuts.

 

[Willysmb]

Brandon turned Afghanistan into the worlds largest gun shop for terrorists.

Real military grade weapons of all types.

Let's not forget 20 years worth of stockpiling all sorts of explosives and other kinetic military hardware and ammo.

Innocent people around the world are going to be slaughtered for the next 100 years because of that decision.

But our MSR's and braced pistols are a HUGE threat.

Yeah right..................

 

[Koda]

It’s super interesting to me that state Supremes haven’t touched their request yet one way or another for overturning the TRO. It’s probably the prudent move to not take any action on it whatsoever and let the trial happen, of which they will be paying keen attention to.

I'm fascinated by this too. IMO it tells me the Oregon Supreme court does not want this to go to SCOTUS. From a gun control perspective their best bet is to let it work out in the lower courts to let stick one of the elements than the whole thing getting shot down.

 

[Librarian]

Ha!

Actual court event - OR replies to Federal Court (OFF et al) motions for preliminary injunction. https://t.co/coNBu2N94x

Let's see what their fever dreams have produced ...

Plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their claims.
A. Measure 114's restrictions on LCMs are consistent with the Second Amendment.
1. LCMs are not "arms" protected by the Second Amendment.
2. LCMs are not "in common use" for self-defense.
3. Restrictions on LCMs are consistent with this country's "historical tradition" of arms regulation.
a. LCMs are a dramatic technological change and implicate new societal concerns.
b. Restrictions on LCMs are consistent with this country's historical tradition of regulating dangerous weapons.
(1) Restrictions on LCMs are comparable to historic restrictions on other dangerous weapons.
(2) Restrictions on LCMs pose a comparable burden as other historic arms regulations.
B. Measure 114's restrictions on LCMs do not violate the Takings Clause.
D. Measure 114's restrictions on LCMs are not impermissibly retroactive.
E. Measure 114's permit-to-purchase requirement complies with the Second Amendment.

 

[HDR]

Ha!

Actual court event - OR replies to Federal Court (OFF et al) motions for preliminary injunction. https://t.co/coNBu2N94x

Let's see what their fever dreams have produced ...

44 pages to say this…

 

[Yarome]

Ha!

Actual court event - OR replies to Federal Court (OFF et al) motions for preliminary injunction. https://t.co/coNBu2N94x

Let's see what their fever dreams have produced ...

Just about every one of their arguments is sooooo far "out there" as to be difficult to really take them seriously. Twisted premises and working the bruen decision in reverse. What a load!

By some of their arguments just on standard mags... they'll have us down to 1 round mags as the only "arms" component necessary for firearm function protected by the 2A.

"Arms" also aren't "in common use" and protected by the 2A unless people are actually pulling the trigger to actually shoot people in defense of their lives(??) That's where you want to go with that one, hu?

 

[Yarome]

My favorite has to be that... standard mags being outlawed don't qualify under the takings provisions because when you bought them... you should have known they may, in the future, fall under restrictive regulation that would make them worthless. [paraphrasing]

"Exercises of police power are not compensable under the Takings Clause. See, e.g., Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1027-28 (1992) ("n the case of personal property, by reason of the State's traditionally high degree of control over commercial dealings, [the property owner] ought to be aware of the possibility that new regulation might even render his property economically worthless[.]")."