JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Afternoon break...

As to the credibility of this statistical consultant data... let me just put it this way. According to his testimony... during 2019-2022... there where exactly 6 (six) DGU's in Portland, OR. 1.2 DGU's per YEAR.

Take that for what you will. The Judge is allowing testimony to continue but it seems rather obvious he finds it quite dubious, not scientifically factual and has repeated on more than one occasion that he will consider the weight of the testimony in his deliberations.
That's laffable…. 1.2 DGU's annually in Portland…. I'd challenge that, gang bangers probably exceed that number any hour on a typical Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday night…

They need to be realistic and honest…. They are after all, under oath….
 
Benitez's conclusion

VI. CONCLUSION
Removable firearm magazines of all sizes are necessary components of semiautomatic firearms. Therefore, magazines come within the text of the constitutional declaration that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Because millions of removable firearm magazines able to hold between 10 and 30 rounds are commonly owned by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, including self-defense, and because they are reasonably related to service in the militia, the magazines are presumptively within the protection of the Second Amendment. There is no American history or tradition of regulating firearms based on the number of rounds they can shoot, or of regulating the amount of ammunition that can be kept and carried. The best analogue that can be drawn from historical gun laws are the early militia equipment regulations that required all able-bodied citizens to equip themselves with a gun and a minimum amount of ammunition in excess of 10 rounds.

Because the State did not succeed in justifying its sweeping ban and dispossession mandate with a relevantly similar historical analogue, California Penal Code § 32310, as amended by Proposition 63, is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined.
 
RE : Post #2,275

CA is in the 9th Circuit (so is WA and OR). So.....if/when it's been decided. Then, WA and OR will (more than likely) also have to comply with at least the reasoning that was used. So then.....maybe WA and OR might give it up?

Yeah, but Nah. I'd suspect that the LEFT will claim that the law as written by WA and OR are totally different. The issues, will need to go to court on those merits.

Note that.....even with the BRUEN decision, we have the current mass of new laws designed to thwart the 2nd A.

".....shall not be infringed."

Anyway.....
The decision of the 9th could also be appealed to the SCOTUS.

Yup. And, we will wait some more. Meanwhile of course, it's all costing us TAXPAYERS.

==========================================================================

More about what happened in CA?


Aloha, Mark
 
Last Edited:
09/22 End of day...

The final witness was a former alphabet agent and the past 10yrs acting as an expert firearm consultant. Nothing substantive was gained by the defense other than to establish that 10rnd mags can not be altered to accept more than 10rnds without some type of tool (pen, pencil, or other) and/or additional parts. IE., An extension.

The witness himself was a bit weak and out of touch with the market, IMHO. Most of his active education in firearms is over a decade old. Among some of his fumbles was declaring that a G23 comes standard with a 10rnd magazine. Additionally, that most all mag extensions require a set screw so a screwdriver would also be necessary. Although he eventually altered his testimony, he also declared that a mag with a limiting block integrated into the base plate may not be altered to accept more than 10rnds. After being asked if the current polymer plug integrated baseplate could be replaced with a standard baseplate to increase the capacity he reluctantly agreed "it may be possible".

He also testified that most extensions require a person to use other tools to reshape or file metal to "fit" an extension.🤣

Regardless... the overall testimony didn't supply a single new bit of relevant information that wasn't already introduced by the plaintiff's witnesses.

The most contentious to me was that he was testifying that having served as a LE officer he does not personally feel that LEO's and private citizens face the same types of SD threats and do not require the same number of rounds to be available to them for their defense. Between the plaintiffs attorney and the Judge it was framed appropriately for the record as his personal opinion and not within his prevue as qualified to offer expert opinion on that matter.

(My own commentary)
Interestingly... he doesn't feel citizen SD requires higher round counts but he personally uses a 10mm 1911... which is of a higher caliber than he carried as a LE agent. I guess in his estimation, citizens personal defense "requires" larger calibers with fewer rounds vs. smaller caliber higher round count firearms(?) :s0155:

The only other point of notice was the defense attempting to imply that if OR M114 goes into affect that the firearm industry will adjust to that new requirement and produce mags compliant to OR's new law. It was cut short of actually saying it, but was headed in that direction before the Plaintiff's curtailed the attempt. Reading between the lines of her questioning and statements though the implication was still there.

Court to resume Monday at 9:00am. The Judge wanting the hearing to be concluded by the end of the day but left open the possibility it may not.
 
Last Edited:
The most contentious to me was that he was testifying that having served as a LE officer he does not personally feel that LEO's and private citizens face the same types of SD issues . . .
Last time I checked my ability to "call in the Calvary" is pretty limited compared to what LEO's can do.

To be fair, part of that might be because I am, well . . . ME :cool:, but I'm guessing on the sliding scale of 'None To LEO' what the rest of you can call in is still closer to me than the LEO's
 
09/22 End of day...

The final witness was a former alphabet agent and the past 10yrs acting as an expert firearm consultant. Nothing substantive was gained by the defense other than to establish that 10rnd mags can not be altered to accept more than 10rnds without some type of tool (pen, pencil, or other) and/or additional parts. IE., An extension.

The witness himself was a bit weak and out of touch with the market, IMHO. Most of his active education in firearms is over a decade old. Among some of his fumbles was declaring that a G23 comes standard with a 10rnd magazine. Additionally, that most all mag extensions require a set screw so a screwdriver would also be necessary. Although he eventually altered his testimony, he also declared that a mag with a limiting block integrated into the base plate may not be altered to accept more than 10rnds. After being asked if the current polymer plug integrated baseplate could be replaced with a standard baseplate to increase the capacity he reluctantly agreed "it may be possible".

He also testified that most extensions require a person to use other tools to reshape or file metal to "fit" an extension.🤣

Regardless... the overall testimony didn't supply a single new bit of relevant information that wasn't already introduced by the plaintiff's witnesses.

The most contentious to me was that he was testifying that having served as a LE officer he does not personally feel that LEO's and private citizens face the same types of SD issues and do not require the same number of rounds to be available to them for their defense. Between the plaintiffs attorney and the Judge it was framed appropriately for the record as his personal opinion and not within his prevue as qualified to offer expert opinion on that matter.

(My own commentary)
Interestingly... he doesn't feel citizen SD requires higher round counts but he personally uses a 10mm 1911... which is of a higher caliber than he carried as a LE agent. I guess in his estimation, citizens personal defense "requires" larger calibers with fewer rounds vs. smaller caliber higher round count firearms(?) :s0155:

The only other point of notice was the defense attempting to imply that if OR M114 goes into affect that the firearm industry will adjust to that new requirement and produce mags compliant to OR's new law. It was cut short of actually saying it, but was headed in that direction before the Plaintiff's curtailed the attempt. Reading between the lines of her questioning and statements though the implication was still there.

Court to resume Monday at 9:00am. The Judge wanting the hearing to be concluded by the end of the day but left open the possibility it may not.
FUDD!
 
Last time I checked my ability to "call in the Calvary" is pretty limited compared to what LEO's can do.

To be fair, part of that might be because I am, well . . . ME :cool:, but I'm guessing on the sliding scale of 'None To LEO' what the rest of you can call in is still closer to me than the LEO's
Both LEOs and civilians are pretty much on their own most of the time, although LEOs tend to react more quickly and en masse when one of their own needs help.

I think the real difference with regards to gunfights, is that LEOs encounter criminals more often than law abiding civilians, but once the gunfight starts, I don't see the number of shots needed as being that different - at least not for a valid reason (it does seem that there are times I read about when LEOs do mag dumps without hitting their targets, sometimes hitting the innocent - whereas law abiding civilians generally stop shooting when the threat ceases).
 
This is my number one question to liberals and then they suddenly get amnesia about what happened during Covid.

I was at my Courthouse Athletics Club in Salem, Oregon when OSP and the state came and shut it down despite all of the Covid rules being followed.

6 feet, mask, cleaning everything , getting temperature checks...etc etc.

Courthouse was fined $250k still for violating the rules.

and still the left has amnesia that the government cares about us.

Go ask those homeless campers in PDX that question about how the government truly cares for us.

View attachment 1492433 View attachment 1492434
CAC never enforced the "rules". john miller said he cannot force his members to wear masks and kept his clubs open for the health of his members despite getting fined which im sure hes not going to pay. as much as i used to dislike the guy for some BS way back, i respected that. i never wore a mask once in any one of his clubs.


also what does this have to do with 114? lol
 
CAC never enforced the "rules". john miller said he cannot force his members to wear masks and kept his clubs open for the health of his members despite getting fined which im sure hes not going to pay. as much as i used to dislike the guy for some BS way back, i respected that. i never wore a mask once in any one of his clubs.


also what does this have to do with 114? lol
They will pick their battles on what to enforce or not enforce and what happens next after they take the guns.

Going after law abiding gun owners because their magazines is no greater than what the state did with Courthouse. They left other places alone and then picked on the ones making a statement or giving pushback.

That is my point.
 
A missed opportunity of the LEOs/former LEOs would've been:

"When you were trained to engage a criminal, how many shots were you told to fire to subdue a bad guy?"

The answer would've made the defense twitch, because I'm pretty sure the answer would've been "however many are needed" with the follow up, "and what number is that?"
 
A missed opportunity of the LEOs/former LEOs would've been:

"When you were trained to engage a criminal, how many shots were you told to fire to subdue a bad guy?"

The answer would've made the defense twitch, because I'm pretty sure the answer would've been "however many are needed" with the follow up, "and what number is that?"
All of them were fired to neutralize the threat.
 
All of them were fired to neutralize the threat.
Right, but that's the point. Cops aren't told to keep it under a round count, and most cops I know to a person will say "you shoot until you don't need to anymore. If you have to reload, you reload." Which is the proper answer for cops and citizens. Cops aren't special, and if anything train a lot more than most citizens (that's a separate problem) so creating a legal disparity between what cops can carry vs. civilians alone is a problem.

At least as corrupt as NJ is, they restricted their cops to what civilians can carry. Garbage state, but I'll at least hand it to them that they took away that disparity as an actual argument.
 
A bit of a side issue, but wanted to bring up that five of the seven Oregon Supreme Court justices will be up for re-election next year. I suspect that the appeals to this trial will have been completed prior to any changes, but wanted people to know that there are changes coming.

Northwest Observer article
 
Learn about the prospects and vote.
Yes. It's a little early to get very much involved but people can certainly start preparing. Calling or emailing your county republican party office and getting on their mailing lists is a start. That way, you should start getting info about the upcoming elections and info on candidates. I'll not get too far involved in that discussion here, just want to remind people that, as members of a representative republic, we need to participate if we want a seat at the table and have our voices heard.
 
A bit of a side issue, but wanted to bring up that five of the seven Oregon Supreme Court justices will be up for re-election next year. I suspect that the appeals to this trial will have been completed prior to any changes, but wanted people to know that there are changes coming.

Northwest Observer article
You got my vote. We get you, @solv3nt , @Stomper and @Yarome on the bench our troubles are over :)
 
You got my vote. We get you, @solv3nt , @Stomper and @Yarome on the bench our troubles are over :)


HA! True, but if that were to ever happen you best invest in rope factory stocks…. cuz there'd be a LOT of neckties being issued, starting from the top on down….. after a fair trial, of course.

:s0093:

IMG_1511.jpeg
 
Last Edited:

Upcoming Events

Arms Collectors of Southwest Washington (ACSWW) gun show
Battle Ground, WA
Redmond Gun Show
Redmond, OR
Sportsmans Outdoor and Shooting Expo
St Helens, OR
Rickreall Winter Gun Show
Rickreall, OR
All Carson Gun Shows Canceled
Carson, WA

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top