Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 6,596
- Reactions
- 10,144
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cerberus announced it would acquire Marlin in December 2007 in a deal scheduled to close in January 2008.
Following completion of the deal, new management started implementing manufacturing process changes, including elimination of some quality inspections, in order to increase production. By 2009, the Marlin ways were quickly being displaced by Remington's 'modern' business and manufacturing practices.
Cerberus announced in March 2010 it would close the North Haven, Ct plant and move Marlinproduction to Ilion, NY. Production in North Haven ceased around April 2011.
I understand quality issues associated with the new operation began showing up late in 2009. I suspect problems intensified when closure of the North Haven plant was announced, and quality bottomed out during and after the transition of production to Ilion, NY.
My current personal benchmark for choosing a Marlin is a manufacturing year of 2008 or earlier. Process changes, morale problems and other issues that undermined stability of Marlinmanufacturing after 2008 make rifles built post-2008 less likely to reflect traditional workmanship, in my opinion. I do own several 2009 Marlins, and these rifles are highly satisfactory in fit, finish and functionality.
Posted by PhotoFeller on GlockTalk. In a continuation post he said....
Here's an interesting Marlin Owners Forum post regarding the JM stamp:
"To my knowledge NO "JM" Proofmarked Barrels EVER left North Haven Marlin.
We kept making Barrels & Receivers up to December 2010 even after ALL our Assembly Equipment was sent to Remington in August 2010.
The Barrels were Rollstamped with North Haven Marlin by us, and Ilion, but you can't Proof Test & Proofmark a Barrel on a rifle that has NOT been Assembled.
Those Receivers would have had North Haven Marlin Serial Numbers Stamped into them, but when Assembled & Proof Tested in Ilion,NY Remington they would have had "REP" Proofmarks on their Barrels. Remington made Receivers would have the "MRxxxxxxxxx" Serial Numbers Stamped.
So, your statement is true.
"If the JM stamp was in fact a "proof stamp" reserved for only Connecticut built Marlins, it also serves as a 'fool proof' symbol for identifying rifles made in the old plants."