Major Win for Us

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by ZigZagZeke, Feb 4, 2016.

Tags:
  1. ZigZagZeke

    ZigZagZeke
    Eugene
    Curmudgeon Silver Supporter 2015 Volunteer

    Messages:
    2,902
    Likes Received:
    4,216
    Just released.

    In the case of Kolbe v. O’Malley, the US Fourth Circuit of Appeals overturned a district court decision upholding the Maryland “Firearm Safety Act” which banned scary semi-auto rifles and full capacity magazines.

    That law is now null and void and this creates a split between the Fourth Circuit and the Seventh Circuit (which upheld the Highland Park, IL scary gun ban).

    We are giddy!


    http://www.gunssavelife.com/?p=19946
     
  2. ZigZagZeke

    ZigZagZeke
    Eugene
    Curmudgeon Silver Supporter 2015 Volunteer

    Messages:
    2,902
    Likes Received:
    4,216
    And a split between the Fourth Circuit and the Seventh Circuit courts means that the USSC may finally have to rule on a case to resolve the differing interpretations.
     
  3. nammac

    nammac
    I-5 Corridor - West of Portland
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    7,914
    The right to bear arms shall not be infringed...

    It's not about flintlocks, muskets or cap and ball firearms...

    It's about AR's, AK's and high capacity magazines...

    Aren't those similar to the arms that the military use?!?!?
     
    dude23, ATCSDav, Dyjital and 5 others like this.
  4. waglockfan

    waglockfan
    Puget Sound
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    767
    Yes, they are.
    I don't recall reading about duck hunting when I read the Bill of Rights, Mrs. Watts.
     
    dude23, ATCSDav, ZigZagZeke and 7 others like this.
  5. Caveman Jim

    Caveman Jim
    West of Oly
    Springer Slayer 2016 Volunteer 2017 Volunteer

    Messages:
    6,823
    Likes Received:
    13,641
    Awesome news, thanks for giving us some seldom GOOD NEWS.

    You beat me to it Waglockfan.

    It ain't bout huntin!!!! By no means!!!!!
     
  6. Sgt Nambu

    Sgt Nambu
    Oregon
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    8,585
    Likes Received:
    14,181
    You mean not every judge is an activist judge? Who knew!
     
  7. rdb241

    rdb241
    Puyallup Washington
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    2,980
    Likes Received:
    3,121
    A round of drinks for everybody!
     
  8. CHLChris

    CHLChris
    Portland Metro East
    Love me some guns! Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    2,129
    Likes Received:
    1,891
    ...for if it were about those kinds of arms, then the First Amendment would only protect pamphlets, newspapers, and books made on a printing press.

    </whiney voice>"But, the Founders never conceived of a blog on the interwebz. They could never have meant for regular citizens to wield that kind of rhetorical firepower." </end whiney voice>
     
    ATCSDav, Brutus57, Slobray and 7 others like this.
  9. Sgt Nambu

    Sgt Nambu
    Oregon
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    8,585
    Likes Received:
    14,181
    "Wield that kind of rhetorical firepower!" LOLOLOL!!!

    Good shot!;)
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2016
  10. rdb241

    rdb241
    Puyallup Washington
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    2,980
    Likes Received:
    3,121
    In all honesty, this has set a precident for the up coming so-called Assault Weapon ban of 2016 for Washington. Not that it will make it off the floor. But now this can be used as a case to overturn any stupid legislation. California and New York...............get on board
     
    ATCSDav, Brutus57, ZigZagZeke and 4 others like this.
  11. Goosebrown

    Goosebrown
    Beaverton
    Well-Known Member 2015 Volunteer

    Messages:
    1,362
    Likes Received:
    2,503
    Fundamental decision. It forces strict scrutiny on laws limiting the 2nd Amendment. Before they used intermediate scrutiny in which they may have been justified in their law. Not now though.
     
    ATCSDav, Slobray, ZigZagZeke and 3 others like this.
  12. tiggers97

    tiggers97
    United States
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    839
    This is good. Now "perception of public safety" won't be a reason anymore to uphold these junk laws.
     
    ATCSDav, Dyjital, Slobray and 4 others like this.
  13. nammac

    nammac
    I-5 Corridor - West of Portland
    Silver Supporter Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    2,858
    Likes Received:
    7,914
    Kalifornia will only get on board when Diane Fienstein, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi et. al. Are finally swept out of office...

    Again if you only let those who pay personal income tax or real estate tax to vote, things will change in a hurry....
     
    ATCSDav, Dyjital, Slobray and 2 others like this.
  14. Caveman Jim

    Caveman Jim
    West of Oly
    Springer Slayer 2016 Volunteer 2017 Volunteer

    Messages:
    6,823
    Likes Received:
    13,641
    This may just be a feather in our cap for celebrating today but it would not surprise me to see the SCOTUS come out and renig on all those recent victories before Owebama is shown the door early next year.....
    Call me a bird dog but America has been all but comatose by the last 7+ years of this Communist administration!!!:mad::mad::mad:
     
    ATCSDav, Dyjital, Slobray and 2 others like this.
  15. Jamie6.5

    Jamie6.5
    Western OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,682
    Likes Received:
    6,258
    I think y'all oughta read the rest of what's at the link in the OP. Nobody "won" anything. Other than the 4th Circus has remanded the case back to the lower court for strict scrutiny.
    They didn't side with the plaintiffs on any of the critical parts of the case.
    And they didn't demand the law be set aside until the case is sorted out.
     
  16. Goosebrown

    Goosebrown
    Beaverton
    Well-Known Member 2015 Volunteer

    Messages:
    1,362
    Likes Received:
    2,503
    The "critical" parts of the case were bubblegum wipes. Used bubblegum wipes at that. Vagueness? BS. Unfair application of the law because retired LEOs got to own them? Again BS. No one is EVER going to win a case on that. It was ONLY there to get them to use strict scrutiny. THAT is the win here.
     
    Slobray and ZigZagZeke like this.
  17. Jamie6.5

    Jamie6.5
    Western OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,682
    Likes Received:
    6,258
    By your standards maybe. When the 4th Circus deems the law unconstitutional I'll call it a win.
    When modern sporting rifles are again for sale in MA, I'll call it a win.

    Until then it's just in limbo.
    Not losing doesn't necessarily mean you won, when there is further review to be done.
     
  18. Goosebrown

    Goosebrown
    Beaverton
    Well-Known Member 2015 Volunteer

    Messages:
    1,362
    Likes Received:
    2,503
    It wasn't a "not loss" it was a clear win by forcing strict scrutiny. I don't think you get how important that is. It has huge implications.
     
    Dyjital and ZigZagZeke like this.
  19. Dave Workman

    Dave Workman
    Western Washington
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,245
    Likes Received:
    2,437
    Yes, it does:
    Maybe this will help out:


    Federal Court requires ‘strict scrutiny’ in AWB challenge

    When a federal appeals court ruled Thursday that the Maryland ban on so-called “assault weapons” created a substantial burden on the right “to arm oneself at home,” it may have set the stage for a legal confrontation that “could have national importance” because of the potential impact on similar bans elsewhere, the Baltimore Sun indicated.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/federal-court-requires-strict-scrutiny-maryland-awb-challenge
     
    ATCSDav, Goosebrown, Dyjital and 5 others like this.
  20. Slobray

    Slobray
    Yelm, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    2,290
    I enjoy Chief Judge Traxler's take on the 7th circus' decision.

    (emphasis mine)

    I especially love the way he called out Judge Robert B. King on his leftist tactics and him ruling based on his opinion and not on the Constitution ....


    Ray
     

Share This Page