Magazines: Proof of date purchased.

[Jay Walk]

I took a picture of a c8
Does not mean I ever sat in one.

 

[ZigZagZeke]

I've never understood the dated newspaper thing. What's to stop me from taking a picture with one marked 11/15/22 on 3/24/24?

That only works in the other direction to prove for instance a hostage is still alive.

 

[Roadkill Bill]

You will need proof that you owned your high capacity magazines prior to this new law 114 taking effect,
I suggest taking photos of your magazines along with a dated news paper in the photo.

I don't have to prove I didn't violate the law. The State must prove I did. They need probable cause to make an arrest!

 

[Gemini9]

I don't have to prove I didn't violate the law. The State must prove I did. They need probable cause to make an arrest!

TRUTH to that~

 

[Member 38805]

Read this nonsensical law and you'll see it reads that "WE" need to prove we owned these magazines prior to 114. So yes, they indeed can require us to prove we owned them previously, if this law stands.
I am actually going to use my electric engraved to put a date on all mine, and take pictures with my camera date shown in the corner. Yes, it may be up to enforcement as to whether any method we use is accepted, but it's better than doing nothing.

 

[AshWilliams]

Read this nonsensical law and you'll see it reads that "WE" need to prove we owned these magazines prior to 114. So yes, they indeed can require us to prove we owned them previously, if this law stands.
I am actually going to use my electric engraved to put a date on all mine, and take pictures with my camera date shown in the corner. Yes, it may be up to enforcement as to whether any method we use is accepted, but it's better than doing nothing.

Same. I'll also be mailing the photos to myself and have the envelope notorized. The pictures will have my OR driver's license with them and the mail will be certified.

 

[Bobbygun]

About as much "affirmative defense" as I feel inclined to muster would be allowing my wife to testify: "Yes. He has had those magazines for a long time. Long before that silly measure passed."

 

[steve263]

The tyranny must end .

 

[jimw234]

You will need proof that you owned your high capacity magazines prior to this new law 114 taking effect,
I suggest taking photos of your magazines along with a dated news paper in the photo.

It is a de facto magazine ban which does not meet the text, history, and tradition of the Second Amendment as outlined by SCOTUS in the Bruen decision.

 

[Thadrius Smith]

Hey, just my personal thoughts on if you're going to do this, and what I plan on doing.
Take a video of yourself with your magazines. Type into your computer and show it in the video asking what todays date is on google. Ask an Alexa or google device what day it is. Post that video to YouTube (unlisted or whatever) of your mags. You have proof of the mags in your possession, with three forms of date on it (google, Alexa, and the YouTube upload date). That's a pretty picture IF they try and take your mags. I don't know of any way to manipulate a YouTube upload date.

 

[The_Crazys]

I plan to, and have when the situation called for it, make gratuitous use of my right to remain silent. Which is active at all times and not just when they remind you. Likely, I give the officer the courtesy of knowing that's what I am doing. I'll be very cautious about how I affirm my defense:
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him."
-Cardinal Richelieu

 

[v0lcom13sn0w]

im not doing anything to my mags. im completely ignoring 114 just like i ignore 554 and 941-in most cases.

 

[Olderguy]

The dated newspaper probably will not be a valid documentation,as any old newspaper can be photographed at any later date. I would suggest a smart phone showing the date with the mags in the same picture

 

[WeaponizedMRE]

Keep them loaded with black tips to assert dominance

 

[Jay Walk]

The dated newspaper probably will not be a valid documentation,as any old newspaper can be photographed at any later date. I would suggest a smart phone showing the date with the mags in the same picture

How does that prove that the picture was not of your neighbors' mags? You could have purchased your own mags after August 8th and smuggled them in from Idaho.

 

[Certaindeaf]

I took a picture of a c8
Does not mean I ever sat in one.

Oh now.

 

[takto101]

Why do you want/need high capacity magazines?
Just wondering why not having them is such a big deal for people?

for one some times its the only mags you can get for the gun. and on the same hand why would it matter how many rounds i have.

 

[tomcat]

I guess I'll be an outlaw ..

 

[nammac]

Seems like lots of planning, plotting and hand ringing for something the SCOTUS has said is unlawful, a violation of Second Amendment Rights and slapped the lower courts in the pee pee for upholding.

Civil disobedience is the correct path to take, magazine capacity limits are unlawful, that's what the Supreme Court of The United States has ruled…. Follow the constitution…. Don't let your Civil Rights be infringed.

 

[DivCurlGrad72]

OFF's take:

And people who should know better keep giving out ridiculous advice to gun owners who face jail time for simply being in possession of constitutionally protected magazines they have owned for decades.

"To prove a gun owner had possession of higher-capacity magazines prior to Measure 114 going into effect , the owner could take a photo with a timestamp of the magazines, state police Capt. Stephanie Bigman suggested"

This clearly preposterous suggestion will only serve to mislead and endanger people.

Obviously, magazines cannot be identified in a photograph since they all look exactly the same. And it's laughable to think a court is going to accept a "time stamped" digital photo when, as you can see, they can be so easily altered.

COURT DATE SET - Oregon Firearms Federation

COURT DATE SET Things are moving quickly in our suit to put Mz 114 on ice. While there is a long battle ahead of us, the first job is to get an injunction to prevent it from going into effect while we demonstrate that it is clearly unconstitutional . Though we had expected others, including […]

www.oregonfirearms.org