Mag capacity

[Mathias]

If the state limits the mag capacity to 10 will manufactorers make compliant mags for the guns already in the hands of owners?

Read More

 

[2A-Jay]

The way I read I1068 is that with Provenance people who already own guns with Magazines holding more than10 rounds when it is signed into law can keep them. or they can be permanently Modified to make them compliant.

 

[11Charlie]

Better get what you need now.

 

[Andy54Hawken]

Sure...
After all the magazine makers want to make a profit...so they will sell you a 10 or a 100 round magazine , if it is legal where you live.
Or are you asking if someone* will give you a legal magazine for where you live...Then I say no...again companies want to make a profit.
* The folks behind a law or restriction / Magazine company

Please note that I do not want magazine restrictions , of any type...
Andy

 

[DirectDrive]

In NJ, you get 18 months for every mag over 10rds in your possession with their new mag law.

According to the NJ guy that just sold me some Beretta 92 15rd mags

 

[DuneHopper]

This is a time yet again, want to remind people that many antigun Democrats hold financial interest in Firearms and ammo manufacturing companies, and why I can not verify specifically magazines and parts. I see no reason why they would not have their fingers in the rest.
Gun ban talk has increased prices on everything every time......its not just coincidentally so. Its by design.

 

[ARFrog]

If the state limits the mag capacity to 10 will manufactorers make compliant mags for the guns already in the hands of owners?

Sure. They already make them for States like California, etc.

Additionally, you have vendors like Magazine Blocks that make blocks to convert existing mags.

 

[surevaliance]

I am just curious how would they deal with guns like Kel-Tec PMR-30 which has standard magazine that holds 30 rounds.

 

[bbbass]

If there is a demand, then some enterprising person or company will make items to fill the demand... = $$$

 

[Alexx1401]

Sure. They already make them for States like California, etc.

Additionally, you have vendors like Magazine Blocks that kake blocks to convert existing mags.

Do states like CA allow those as legal? It looks like it just can be put in and taken out? If so I'm kind of surprised CA would allow that??

 

[User 1234]

California requires the mag block to be "permanently" installed. Many people use super glue to glue the floor plate on. Other people believe that you need a rivet, but there is confusion over the issue right now.

 

[ARFrog]

California requires the mag block to be "permanently" installed. Many people use super glue to glue the floor plate on. Other people believe that you need a river, but there is confusion over the issue right now.

+1 to this statement. Once again the legislature leaves things ambiguous.

 

[User 1234]

I can say that I have heard from unnamed persons in California that they don't try especially hard to find standard capacity magazines unless the person is an a hole or engaged in some other criminal activity.

 

[nammac]

The whole conversation around magazine capacity limits is really moot isn't it? Didn't the California law restricting magazine capacity just get struck down by the courts in recent weeks?

Or perhaps I'm misinformed...

 

[User 1234]

The injunction only prevents the state from eliminating the grandfathering protection for people who legally owned 10+ mags in California in 1999 or earlier. The court did not prohibit the state from enforcing the ban on transfers, imports or purchases. And given the 9th Circuit court of appeals frequent liberal decisions this trial court ruling is likely to be reversed on appeal. There have been some pro-freedom rulings from the 9th that surprise everyone but those are rare.