- Messages
- 1,897
- Reactions
- 971
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've recently started to see comments about ultra short barrel length with the .45 causing some ballistic problems. I'm regurgitating here and have not done the research myself but the little I have read has the 3" .45 as not long enough for a cartridge designed around a 5" barrel.
Pending further research I would at least take that partially into consideration if you're considering a <4" barrel.
Give me the twelve .40S&W rounds over the nine .45acp rounds any day. With my accuracy I need as many chances to hit the bad guys as possible.
Have you considered a para ordnance p-13 or glock 21? If you are just choosing between two weapons you already own then I would go with the BHP in .40. I owned one a long time ago but I remember the recoil was not any worse than a .45 even in the fairly compact and light setup the BHP provides. So given that controllability is about the same I would favor the extra firepower provided by the increased capacity. Bullet placement will always be the key factor with handgun bullets. Just as an aside, I wonder how a .357 SIG barrel would handle in the BHP?
The question what would you prefer to carry
8+1 rounds of .45 or 11+1 rounds of .40 S&W
I am contemplating carrying .40 S&W BHP vrs my current 1911
Thanks
Andy
I have a .357 barrel for the BHP... you cannot use factory .357 loads and you must download it at least 20% as far as pressure.. this is because the .357 has MUCH higher pressure than .40!