I didnt do a search so bear with me if there are threads out there. I often have heard that if I was ever in a situation where I had to draw and fire in self defense that the opposing side's attorney would look for every angle to move blame to my side. Ive heard things like "dont use hand loaded ammo" or, "dont have any Tactical training" and things like that. People have told me that a lawyer could paint a person to look like they have been training or preparing to shoot someone. What are some opinions out there? Would someone who is a competition shooter be more at risk of a lawsuit if they end up shooting someone in SD and the opposing lawyer paints them as a blood-thirsty gun toting professional shooter who was just waiting for a victim?