- Messages
- 260
- Reactions
- 132
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Makes perfect sense to me. I just can't see what the debate is all about. What it comes down to, in my opinion, is that there is no debate as to what it means. The debate is whether or not to strike it completely. To disarm the people is, in effect, striking the 2nd amendment from the Bill of Rights. An important question I ask is, if the 2nd amendment is removed from the Bill of Rights, which one is next?
Makes perfect sense to me. I just can't see what the debate is all about. What it comes down to, in my opinion, is that there is no debate as to what it means. The debate is whether or not to strike it completely. To disarm the people is, in effect, striking the 2nd amendment from the Bill of Rights. An important question I ask is, if the 2nd amendment is removed from the Bill of Rights, which one is next?