- Messages
- 5,370
- Reactions
- 7,753
First, if this is in the wrong section, sorry, and feel free to move it appropriately. I did a brief search through the archives and couldn't find anything on this topic.
There are several A.R.M.S. products that I find intriguing. I've fondled several of them and like some of them. Several people who I respect use their products. Now the dilemma. I judge a company not only on their product, but also on the way they conduct themselves in other arenas. Like it or not, that's the way I feel about it.
I have heard several rumors about some shady dealings that the executives at A.R.M.S. have been doing. These range from frivolously suing other manufacturers over so-called violations of copyrights, to trying to copyright the number 17, to giving money to virulently anti-gun U.S. Senate candidate Martha Coakley in Massachusetts. I was wondering which of these rumors was true and which is just conspiracy. Links would be good as otherwise its just more rumors...
There are several A.R.M.S. products that I find intriguing. I've fondled several of them and like some of them. Several people who I respect use their products. Now the dilemma. I judge a company not only on their product, but also on the way they conduct themselves in other arenas. Like it or not, that's the way I feel about it.
I have heard several rumors about some shady dealings that the executives at A.R.M.S. have been doing. These range from frivolously suing other manufacturers over so-called violations of copyrights, to trying to copyright the number 17, to giving money to virulently anti-gun U.S. Senate candidate Martha Coakley in Massachusetts. I was wondering which of these rumors was true and which is just conspiracy. Links would be good as otherwise its just more rumors...