Is this too over the top???

Discussion in 'General Firearm Discussion' started by yskippy, Mar 27, 2010.

  1. yskippy

    yskippy
    Tigard
    Life Member Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    392
  2. gunnails

    gunnails
    Hillsboro
    Active Member

    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    232
    I can't say I have a problem with this, infact I think it is way cool.

    Reminds me of that Godzila thing that use to come to the Hillsboro Air Show and eat cars then torch them, well at least the torching part.

    Great way to stop tailgaters, although that would be wrong and I do not support that.:thumbup:
     
  3. nwo

    nwo
    Southern Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    245
    That is VERY cool.

    Arrested on a 'firearms" offense. That is so lame. I do NOT support that.
     
  4. Dyjital

    Dyjital
    Albany, Ore
    Flavorite Member Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    6,448
    Likes Received:
    10,092
    Well, it doesn't look like a firearm.

    It depends though on what the UK's definition of a "firearm" is.
     
  5. gunnails

    gunnails
    Hillsboro
    Active Member

    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    232
    http://www.suffolk.police.uk/Services/Firearms+Licensing/Frequently+Asked+Questions/

    Doesen't sound like a flame throwing scooter meets the definition,,,
     
  6. spengo

    spengo
    GLORIOUS CASCADIA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,267
    Likes Received:
    30
    It's over the top to arrest him. :V
     
  7. spengo

    spengo
    GLORIOUS CASCADIA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,267
    Likes Received:
    30
    Um... wat? He wasn't destroying property or killing people. It's just for looks...
     
  8. Mookie

    Mookie
    Eastern Washington
    Active Member

    Messages:
    188
    Likes Received:
    30
    would this not be a firebutt offense?

    How is this any different than a hot rod that shoots flames? Heck, my old dodge shadow would pop flames when the turbo got to hot.
     
  9. MarkSBG

    MarkSBG
    Beaverton Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,464
    Likes Received:
    46
    :rofl1:
    :rofl1:
    :rofl1:
     
  10. 4Freedom

    4Freedom
    Olympia
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,163
    Likes Received:
    982
    The question I have to ask now is...

    How can I set one of those up on my SUV???!!! :D:D
     
  11. MarkSBG

    MarkSBG
    Beaverton Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,464
    Likes Received:
    46
    But that would convert it into a firearm! :laugh:
     
  12. BillM

    BillM
    Amity OR
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    669
    Love it---"His first attempt failed to ignite, and the second burst into flames"
    He would be an idiot to actually USE it. 300 pound scooter vs. a full size
    whatever--looks like a good way to get a new nickname. Speedbump.

    "But Lincolnshire Police spotted the pictures of Mr Furze allegedly riding his scooter on a public highway – and arrested him on Thursday.

    tHe was held on suspicion of possessing an object converted into a firearm, and was released on unconditional police bail without charge until May 6 pending further police investigation"

    So they arrested him and released him on bail without charging him? WTF?
     
  13. cyclesarge

    cyclesarge
    Eugene OR, DUH! We're ALL in the NORTHWEST
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,367
    Likes Received:
    77
    So, I take it you've never ridden a scooter that doesn't have the power to get out it's own way, much less out of the way of a speeding mini van driven by a single mom who is too busy putting on her makeup and text chatting to be distracted by her 4 screaming children. Talk about " destroying property at the very least and killing people at the very most". A little fire would be a nice wake up call for some drivers.:laugh:
     
  14. Redcap

    Redcap
    Lewis County, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,986
    Likes Received:
    2,745
    A flamethrower is NOT considered a Destructive Device.
     
  15. cyclesarge

    cyclesarge
    Eugene OR, DUH! We're ALL in the NORTHWEST
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,367
    Likes Received:
    77
    30,000 miles isn't A LOT, but SHOULD be enough to have experienced an inattentive driver crowding you, I guess you are REALLY lucky. I really doubt this was any kind of attempt to damage property or harm people, but more of "over the top" vehicular statement. Some people just have no sense of humor.:laugh:
     
  16. The B

    The B
    NW Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,997
    Likes Received:
    2,601
    "flame thrower" im sure is a loosely used term here. what's the fuel? the only reason flame throwers are dangerous is because they shoot a liquid thats on fire. i'm sure this is nothing more than a propane or butane torch, not a "flame thrower."

    it might singe the dust on somebody's bumper. dangerous from a safety standpoint to be driving around with a torch of unknown QC in its construction, and maybe calls for the driver being cited for using it, if he uses it, but it's a gag, and the risk of people getting hurt are actually pretty damn low, i'd imagine. i used to do "torch-down" roofing- i burned a propane torch for 10-12 hours a day every day. i burned myself a few times, never seriously.. it just singes the hair off your arms, even from a pretty direct blast.
     
  17. gettersideways

    gettersideways
    PNW
    New Member

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0

Share This Page