- Messages
- 14,899
- Reactions
- 27,415
As per the provisions of the original Taft-Hartley and Wagner Acts. Anything else should be considered criminal.Do I see a point for unions, totally.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As per the provisions of the original Taft-Hartley and Wagner Acts. Anything else should be considered criminal.Do I see a point for unions, totally.
ILWU Local 21 run in with local media
NWS -language warning
Longshore Union Member Attacks Media - Mirror - YouTube
ILWU Local 21 run in with local media
NWS -language warning
Longshore Union Member Attacks Media - Mirror - YouTube
That is incorrect:Well from what I have read there never was an agreement with the port, verbal or written. And I found this.
EGT started the fight by suing the Port of Longview to void the stipulation in its lease that requires EGT to hire Local 21 members. The trial is set to begin next year and could drag on for years. In the meantime, EGT has broken off negotiations with the ILWU and is operating its terminal as if it had already won the case.
Be it resolved that the Oregon AFL-CIO state federation Executive Board and its local union affiliates condemn in the strongest way possible the scab labor actions of OE Local 701, and further;
Be it resolved that the Oregon AFL-CIO state federation send a letter to OE Local 701 demanding that Local 701 immediately cease and desist from allowing its members to displace ILWU longshoremen at the EGT facility in the Port of Longview, and finally;
Be it resolved that the Oregon AFL-CIO publicize this resolution and its opposition to Local 701s actions on its web sites front page and as the headline issue in its Weekly Update.
My wife just said "And they wander why noone wants to hire them, when their people have names like "Phuck You **********" thats sure a weird name." What a jackwagon. He didn't look Oriental to me
So, if EGT started it, WHY did they sue to get out of the contract? Was it JUST because they didn't want to pay these childish, money-grubbers? Or was there some other crap that was pulled by either the port of Longview or the union that would give them cause to reconsider their decision?
I believe you are 100% correct ride!I really think that this is a glimpse of the upcoming election cycle.
I believe you are 100% correct ride!
It's old school chicago politics plain and simple.
We will be up to our necks in union and racial violence before the results of the 2012 race are in the books.
That is incorrect:
I don't get why you guys are supporting this corporation. This multi-national corporation swindles millions from the city of Longview to build their terminal, with the stipulation in their contract that they would use local union labor to build the terminal and ILWU local 21 to operate it. Then this company just ignores their contract and hires out of state non-union labor to build the terminal, and some patsy union to operate it. That's millions of public dollars that should have gone back into the pockets of the locals that paid those taxes.
This Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local 701 has been denounced by the Oregon AFL-CIO:
:huh: I thought on the video he said his name was Bubblegum U. BubblegumSucker.STAVAS was identified by a witness after seeing a KGW TV video at the union hall where STAVAS confronted the news crew.
Right. I look forward to the day when we get back to working for $1/hr. And those damn kids, what are they doing in school all day when they could be helping support their families by working in a mine or a factory?
[Insert predictable Ayn Rand style bs reply here...]