Inquest proper in police shootings

Discussion in 'General Firearm Discussion' started by Dave Workman, Oct 12, 2010.

  1. Dave Workman

    Dave Workman
    Western Washington
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,246
    Likes Received:
    2,439
    Inquest proper in questionable police shootings

    We screen them, we train them, they are sworn in and entrusted with a badge and gun, given awesome responsibility, considerable authority that is supposed to be tempered with discretion, and in the event they take a human life, they are subjected to a remarkable degree of scrutiny to assure they acted properly, deciding perhaps in a split second to commit an act that will be examined by a committee that has the luxury of time.

    Inquest proper in questionable police shootings - Seattle gun rights | Examiner.com

    Or try this:

    Inquest proper in questionable police shootings - Seattle gun rights | Examiner.com
     
  2. Chee-to

    Chee-to
    Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,307
    Likes Received:
    1,828
    If a officer of the law takes a life, he/she should be under the same scrutiny as a civilian, in fact even more.....
     
  3. Dave Workman

    Dave Workman
    Western Washington
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,246
    Likes Received:
    2,439
    You mean, under the same scrutiny as a "private citizen" don't you?

    Police are "civilian law enforcement." They are NOT military.
     
  4. Chee-to

    Chee-to
    Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,307
    Likes Received:
    1,828
    Noun

    * S: (n) citizen (a native or naturalized member of a state or other political community) .............:thumbup:
     
  5. clearconscience

    clearconscience
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,417
    Likes Received:
    9,582
    I do agree LEOs should be held accountable for their weapons just as we do, However, we shouldn't try to crucify LEOs just because their are doing their jobs. Portland has a rich history of trying to treat Cops like they are super heroes and can stop a person by some other means.
    Sometimes you have no other option, and if a jury clears you then you were justified.

    Except in Portland.

    Thank God I moved.
     
  6. Father of four

    Father of four
    Portland, Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,311
    Likes Received:
    1,696
  7. Sasquatchvnv

    Sasquatchvnv
    Port Orchard
    Active Member

    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    171
  8. MountainBear

    MountainBear
    Sweet Home, OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,767
    Likes Received:
    2,791
    They are not military, they are civilians along with the rest of us. They are INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY! All too often people run to crucify them based on what is reported in the newspapers (not like they ever lie to us) and hearsay from other people. The opposite also happens. People rush to defend them based on less than all the facts. Neither is proper. They deserve no more consideration than anyone else, however, they deserve no less than anyone either.

    I suggest we wait until they are either convicted or exonerated by a jury of their peers, whether this be a criminal or grand jury, before we rush to judgment. The smell test is unreliable and should not be used in place of actual facts. And chances are, unless you are on a jury looking into a case, you won't know all the facts, regardless if a video of the incident is on the web. Its very easy just to view the good or bad parts of an incident and leave out preceding or proceeding events...
     

Share This Page