Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 24,463
- Reactions
- 37,077
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would suggest that we need to try and duplicate what nature has done for millions of years. Forest were dependent on fire to keep the understory free of excess fuels and keep the stand densities in check. Now that we have prevented most of these fire from doing the job they used to do, we have ended up with a great excess of fuels and very crowded forest. Harvesting would help as would managment of underbrush growth but they can't seem to find a way to do it like the fires did. We have environuts who challenge any changes to the forest conditions. Cost for fuel reduction treatsment are high. Prescribed fire options are limited due to weather and nearby resident compaints of smoke.Selective harvest and management of underbrush growth.
Timber is a renewable resource.
If you own land, you should be responsible enough with it to understand that you need to clear out dry brush and windfall on a yearly basis. Public and municipal lands should utilize a combo of prison labor, community service labor, and people on unemployment (who would be paid a bit above minimum wage) to clear it. Use our tax money for something smart for once.
If they dont decide that they want to use the forest as personal property, cut trees down for huts/debris shelters, set on fire, or make methlabsI would add that moving our feral street population into a labor camp situation to do this work would also serve a multi purpose approach as well.
Our streets would be cleared(garbage and feral humans), our forests would be cleaned of dry brush, and the ferals might learn an employable skill(forest management practices).
If they dont decide that they want to use the forest as personal property, cut trees down for huts/debris shelters, set on fire, or make methlabs
You ever noticed that the "working forests" that Weyerhauser and other mills manages, almost never seem to get as serious wildfires as the National Forests?
And they sell access permits in some areas for recreational purposes as well. I know there are some that doesn't require permits to just hike in, as long as there aren't active logging operations.It's as if private industry foresters might be doing what is in the best interest of harvesting the most timber.
In turn, that probably means managing the woods in a manner that doesnt set them up to burn down every year...
And they sell access permits in some areas for recreational purposes as well. I know there are some that doesn't require permits to just hike in, as long as there aren't active logging operations.
I noticed that as well in '19. Hadn't been there in over 30 years, still looks the same.Speaking of management, I was at East Lake years ago and the whole camping area had been allowed to run unchecked.. it was literally solid with 8" diameter 30' pines 10" from each other. I'd never seen anything like it.
Before, it was a classic, open, park-like setting, with just a few trees etc scattered about. Now it's just a million matchsticks.I noticed that as well in '19. Hadn't been there in over 30 years, still looks the same.
It is the same on Hwy 22 on the east slope. All they need to do is extend those same management practices throughout federal lands. Letting the forests burn is a poor substitute.On my drives down to cabin I often glance over at the roadside and while they have done thinning and clearing work about 50ft on both sides of hwy97, beyond that it looks like a solid tree fence. It is mostly lodgepole with some ponderosa and occasional Aspen mixed in.