If you could ask Dems a question

[Dave Workman]

Questions for Hillary, Dem rivals that won't be asked tonight or ever

Tonight's not-so-much anticipated Democrat debate on CNN is not going to be conducted like the network did the Republican presidential debate, with questions that point candidates at each other's jugular, and there are a handful of questions not likely to be asked that could paint leading contenders Hillary Rodham Clinton and Bernie Sanders into a corner on the gun issue.

<broken link removed>

Read More

 

[slimmer13]

How about "how exactly would any of your proposed gun legislative have prevented any of the recent high profile mass shootings?".

 

[Caveman Jim]

Yeah, they see there is little chance they will keep the presidency in 2016 so they must paint all Democraps as "for the little guy".
But just true to form they DO NOT keep their campaign promises!!! They WILL promote more anti 2A propaganda at every turn!!!!

 

[Just Jim]

I would ask her if it bothers her that over 80 men,women and childeren were gassed and burned when her and bill tried to take the guns of people near Waco. Is that going to be continued as her anti gun policy?

 

[Member 5605]

Instead of asking a question to what we know an answer...

A proper question be formatted to fully expose their agenda while playing benign and appearing in their corner.

"When you are elected as POTUS 2016, what will be your first piece of legislation to end violence in this country. Give specifics."

 

[albin25]

Madame Secretary, If given an opportunity to raise funds for Planned Parenthood, how much would need to be pledged to get you to hold hands with Bernie Sanders,
...sing Kum Ba Yah...
...then jump from the Golden Gate Bridge?

 

[Deebow]

I wouldn't. They are so "open minded" that their brains have fallen out.

I make it a policy to never ask Democrats a question; it just becomes an argument with an idiot, wherein they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

 

[filsonhand]

How do you libs sleep at night, knowing you are gonna put santa out of business with all the free stuff you are promising.

Ooooohhhhh well everyone can blaze a bowl and live in lala land

 

[salmonriverjohn]

One question?
Just what would it take to get you to go away?

 

[Raidingtime]

How is this thread allowed on this website? NWFA is meant as a place to gather people from all walks of life, including all political parties, to better create a welcoming community of pro firearms talk.

I find it disturbing that a thread I created awhile back about sustainable living was deleted for political reasons yet democrats and liberals are bashed all over this site.

Some of us here are democrats and liberals and still are pro gun. Why constantly try to target all people of one party as anti gun. We're not all anti gun!

Believe it or not but some of us "socialists" carry 24/7 and are very pro constitutional rights. Discussions like this only creates a further dividing line between populations within the US. Why would a liberal democrat want to support gun rights when they're isolated from the pro gun community?

 

[salmonriverjohn]

Your not isolated buddy, your an exception to the common

 

[Just Jim]

It's like saying, " I ride with the outlaws that want to steal your guns but I ain't one of them, honest".

It's the democrats stealing guns and our rights, nobody else is.

 

[slimmer13]

How is this thread allowed on this website? NWFA is meant as a place to gather people from all walks of life, including all political parties, to better create a welcoming community of pro firearms talk.

I find it disturbing that a thread I created awhile back about sustainable living was deleted for political reasons yet democrats and liberals are bashed all over this site.

Some of us here are democrats and liberals and still are pro gun. Why constantly try to target all people of one party as anti gun. We're not all anti gun!

Believe it or not but some of us "socialists" carry 24/7 and are very pro constitutional rights. Discussions like this only creates a further dividing line between populations within the US. Why would a liberal democrat want to support gun rights when they're isolated from the pro gun community?

We bash those who try to take our rights. The other side of the aisle goes after different sets of rights but since this a gun forum we focus on democrats who propose 99.9 percent of anti gun legislation.

If non firearm political discussion was allowed we could bash the right side for 4th amendment erosions, attempting to legislate morality etc etc etc.

 

[Oregonhunter5]

Id ask, how is it that you and I are so different.

 

[41Slinger]

Madam Hilary, why do you want to take my 2A rights away ?

As you future, ahem, leader I am here to help all of you get your free stuff and make you feel better.

That's not what I ask you, please answer the question.

Next question please !!

 

[etrain16]

How is this thread allowed on this website? NWFA is meant as a place to gather people from all walks of life, including all political parties, to better create a welcoming community of pro firearms talk.

I find it disturbing that a thread I created awhile back about sustainable living was deleted for political reasons yet democrats and liberals are bashed all over this site.

Some of us here are democrats and liberals and still are pro gun. Why constantly try to target all people of one party as anti gun. We're not all anti gun!

Believe it or not but some of us "socialists" carry 24/7 and are very pro constitutional rights. Discussions like this only creates a further dividing line between populations within the US. Why would a liberal democrat want to support gun rights when they're isolated from the pro gun community?

There is a reason you're seeing that kind of bashing on a pro-gun site. It's really quite simple, and plain to see. There is one, and only one party that is working to take our rights away, and that's not the Republican party.

SB941 in Oregon was 100% created, supported and pushed through by Democrats in the House and Senate, signed into law by a temporary, un-elected Democrat Governor. It's not a question of whether some did or didn't support it, they voted party line to take our rights away. Why wouldn't we be pissed about that?

I know a number of liberal pro-gun folks. They love their guns, but the party they vote for doesn't. It doesn't help the pro-gun side when votes are cast for people that have made it clear they have no interest in protecting those rights. I'm no fan of the Republican party myself, but I'm sick and tired of my rights being under attack. And I'll vote whatever way will help to keep those rights intact.

Can you get your party to stop attacking our rights? Can you get them to listen and to leave this alone? A few dem gun owners I've spoken with have told me that their party doesn't listen to them, to the point where they feel like outcasts in their own party. But yet some still vote for them because they'd rather vote for them than for the evil Republicans.

Unfortunately, the Democrats on the state and federal level have decided to make guns a partisan issue, at least in the sense that they are now on the constant offensive to further restrict or remove those rights. If you identify yourself with them, and vote to keep them in office, don't be surprised when pro-gun, pro-liberty folks get more than a little ticked off. I mean, people on the left get pissed at conservatives all day long. Go to a liberal gun site (yes, they exist, I've been there) and read the really nasty things they say about conservatives. There is no moral high ground here, they do just as much bashing.

But, this is a pro-gun site. Anti-gun folks are not friendly to our cause. And at this time in history, Democrat politician = Anti-gun politician. It's not surprising then, that many would extend that to the voters that keep putting them in office.

I would recommend using your influence to warn legislators on the Democrat side to leave gun rights alone, or you won't vote for them. Tell them it will cost them their seats, and then get every single Democrat gun owner to do the same. I already know they won't listen to someone like me (Libertarian), I've tried, they won't listen. So, if you can use your love of guns to stop them from doing what they're doing, maybe you'll see some of that bashing go away.

 

[Oathkeeper1775]

If I found myself to be in the most-unfortunate situation to be within talking distance of a democrat, and bestowed with the priviledge....of asking one question; as if I actually would expect an honest answer, not a meta-discussion (about the discussion), or a tanngential point....I might ask this:

What makes you think that you are smarter than all of us combined?

That is the pre-requisite to be able to decide what is best for all of us....

A follow-up question would be: Since you and your politburo have waved the moral-standing to govern, by supporting abortion; the killing of innocent human beings, how can you hope to reconcile with your maker (yourself since you obviously consider yourselves to be demi-gods)?

 

[Oathkeeper1775]

How is this thread allowed on this website? NWFA is meant as a place to gather people from all walks of life, including all political parties, to better create a welcoming community of pro firearms talk.

I find it disturbing that a thread I created awhile back about sustainable living was deleted for political reasons yet democrats and liberals are bashed all over this site.

Some of us here are democrats and liberals and still are pro gun. Why constantly try to target all people of one party as anti gun. We're not all anti gun!

Believe it or not but some of us "socialists" carry 24/7 and are very pro constitutional rights. Discussions like this only creates a further dividing line between populations within the US. Why would a liberal democrat want to support gun rights when they're isolated from the pro gun community?

The meta discussion (a discussion about a discussion). Your reply is a tangential point, and should be deleated.

 

[DuneHopper]

How is this thread allowed on this website? NWFA is meant as a place to gather people from all walks of life, including all political parties, to better create a welcoming community of pro firearms talk.

I find it disturbing that a thread I created awhile back about sustainable living was deleted for political reasons yet democrats and liberals are bashed all over this site.

Some of us here are democrats and liberals and still are pro gun. Why constantly try to target all people of one party as anti gun. We're not all anti gun!

Believe it or not but some of us "socialists" carry 24/7 and are very pro constitutional rights. Discussions like this only creates a further dividing line between populations within the US. Why would a liberal democrat want to support gun rights when they're isolated from the pro gun community?

I Removed my comment was way off topic .

 

[Raidingtime]

There is a reason you're seeing that kind of bashing on a pro-gun site. It's really quite simple, and plain to see. There is one, and only one party that is working to take our rights away, and that's not the Republican party.

SB941 in Oregon was 100% created, supported and pushed through by Democrats in the House and Senate, signed into law by a temporary, un-elected Democrat Governor. It's not a question of whether some did or didn't support it, they voted party line to take our rights away. Why wouldn't we be pissed about that?

I know a number of liberal pro-gun folks. They love their guns, but the party they vote for doesn't. It doesn't help the pro-gun side when votes are cast for people that have made it clear they have no interest in protecting those rights. I'm no fan of the Republican party myself, but I'm sick and tired of my rights being under attack. And I'll vote whatever way will help to keep those rights intact.

Can you get your party to stop attacking our rights? Can you get them to listen and to leave this alone? A few dem gun owners I've spoken with have told me that their party doesn't listen to them, to the point where they feel like outcasts in their own party. But yet some still vote for them because they'd rather vote for them than for the evil Republicans.

Unfortunately, the Democrats on the state and federal level have decided to make guns a partisan issue, at least in the sense that they are now on the constant offensive to further restrict or remove those rights. If you identify yourself with them, and vote to keep them in office, don't be surprised when pro-gun, pro-liberty folks get more than a little ticked off. I mean, people on the left get pissed at conservatives all day long. Go to a liberal gun site (yes, they exist, I've been there) and read the really nasty things they say about conservatives. There is no moral high ground here, they do just as much bashing.

But, this is a pro-gun site. Anti-gun folks are not friendly to our cause. And at this time in history, Democrat politician = Anti-gun politician. It's not surprising then, that many would extend that to the voters that keep putting them in office.

I would recommend using your influence to warn legislators on the Democrat side to leave gun rights alone, or you won't vote for them. Tell them it will cost them their seats, and then get every single Democrat gun owner to do the same. I already know they won't listen to someone like me (Libertarian), I've tried, they won't listen. So, if you can use your love of guns to stop them from doing what they're doing, maybe you'll see some of that bashing go away.

Already there man. I email my representatives about firearm legislation every couple of months (I.e. The steel core 556 ban and 941, etc.). I've ran into the typical generic bull bubblegum response that essentially reads "I don't care what you think. Have a nice day."


The problem I've personally ran into is not having a representative that represents policies that I support along with following constitutional rights including firearm ownership. For this reason I vote republican and democrat. I am not a republican nor a democrat. I do sometimes support democrats though.


political parties tend to dehumanize and insult each other and I'm aware of this. The statement I'm trying to makes is the following:


"Support the firearm community and do not alienate segments of the community"


I'm making this post so there can be a discussion going here instead of me reporting most of the comments and the thread as being "political". For that reason the post ought to be deleted.


If we want to make a statement, as this thread is about, let's address it to anti firearm politicians instead of democrats.