Back to Ifish, Maybe I can sneak back in after being banned. NOT
We believe the 2nd Amendment is best defended through grass-roots organization, education, and advocacy centered around individual gun owners. It is our mission to encourage, organize, and support these efforts throughout Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming.
Create Free Account Already a member? Log InHeck I once tried to JOIN Ifish to see what the fuss was all about and couldn't get in. No response from admin,etc. so I forgot about it.Back to Ifish, Maybe I can sneak back in after being banned. NOT
IIRC.....the second version missed it.Red dawn remake seems a lot closer to home now... Anyone agree?
Oh at only six posts you ain't seen nothing yet. Give it some time and you'll see more!Not even sure why this is a question or that there is any reason this thread exists.
It isn’t about any posts on this website. The concern over getting censored by big tech stems from being a conservative gun-related website. Look at the trend in censoring over the last six months.Did I miss the sedition threads that would cause it to implode? I'm just here to read about guns and places to shoot, so I'm not sure why this is a serious question.
Thank you for reminding me how young i am lol. I don't recall having ever written a check in my life. But no doubt if gun forums were only able to operate off of checks, i don't see them receiving as much revenue moving into the future with increasingly younger demographics at play and all.Some of usdiscovered an actual "check" will accomplish the same thing.
LOL......Thank you for reminding me how young i am lol. I don't recall having ever written a check in my life. But no doubt if gun forums were only able to operate off of checks, i don't see them receiving as much revenue moving into the future with increasingly younger demographics at play and all.
Don't worry....the Govt already has all the information.Don't forget your social.
No, that is not the definition of censorship. Look it up.Censorship is when the government stops speech.
Besides the factual error on what constitutes censorship, your logic lends itself well to positively reactionary positions as old as the debates themselves.When big tech "deplatforms" people it is a business decision.