- Messages
- 10
- Reactions
- 11
The cry of the Anti-gunners is always the same. Gun owners will not compromise and don't care about the children. The NRA is a Terrorist organization and all the Politicians that support the 2nd amendment are "paid off" by said organization. Well, I am here to solve the gun/anti-gun crisis splitting our country in two. I have, most humbly, taken it upon myself to represent ALL gun owners across the land and have every confidence that what I am about to negotiate is a dream come true for all Hoplophobes everywhere. I am here to give them everything they have asked for. All they need to do is agree to stop introducing any new gun-control measures. After all, all those scary instruments of mass destruction will be banned forever.
First to be banned of course is the most heinous of all evil guns the "Assault Rifle". The number one rifle requested to be banned by all those "experts" in congress and Hollywood.
Ok, so there you go. See, we are willing to compromise. "Quid pro quo" what are you willing to compromise on? How about getting rid of "Gun free zones" since it's where almost all the mass shootings take place. Let's make it a crime to violate a citizens right to keep and BARE arms.
Next weapon we are willing to ban is the AR-15 that weighs as much as ten full moving boxes and fires the .50 cal. Round. If it has a standard AR15 barrel and it is capable of firing a .50 cal. projectile we would be willing to get rid of it. We compromise you must also compromise.
Now your turn! lets have country wide concealed carry, One license that works in 50 states. It would be a boon to state and local government income, crime would go down as would the number of mass shootings and if you want to keep your state license you can, no forced switch to a new one until yours expires. Reciprocity for all citizens of all states.
Next on the list of scary guns and ammo the Socialists hate are those pesky heat seeking missile rounds with incendiary device, the ones that can "lock on" and go around corners. " Some of these bullets, as you saw, have an incendiary device on the tip of it, which is a heat seeking device. So, you don't shoot deer with a bullet that size. If you do you could cook it at the same time." -
So, we are willing to eliminate these rounds from the civilian marketplace. Again, Military, law enforcement and only civilians with the proper documentation can own these. Fair enough?
Now your turn. We want you to recognize that the 2nd amendment of the bill of rights is in fact addressing an individual right not revocable by state or Federal government. The Second Amendment is not just about hunting. It's about self-defense, hunting, protection from tyrannical governments, sport/competition and historical relevance.
We are all ears for compromise, For example the infamous "Ghost gun" that fires 30 bullets in a half second or even the Thirty magazine clip. "This is a ghost gun. This right here has the ability with a .30-caliber clip to disperse with 30 bullets within half a second. Thirty magazine clip in half a second." - Kevin de Leon
Ok, fair enough. Any firearm that can fire 30 bullets in half a second whether it has a "Thirty magazine clip or not"
Will hereby be restricted to military or police or properly licensed FFLs. See we can negotiation!
For this most gracious compromise we will want a reasonable common-sense gun safety measure in return for giving up half second 30 bullet magazine clips. Allow gun safety/training classes in schools again to protect our children from accidental and negligent shooting accidents. We must teach them what true dangers await them in the real world such as misinformation and propaganda as well as training in how to avoid and or spot "unstable people", Propaganda, and potentially dangerous places or people i.e. "GUN FREE ZONES" and "Beta O'Rourke"
"The Second Amendment only protects the people who want all the guns they can have. The rest of us, we've got no Second Amendment. What are we supposed to do?" - Louise Slaughter So, you can be rest assured we will defend your right to keep and bare arms no matter what your politics are we will even protect your right not to carry or own firearms. All we ask is that you do the same for us.
OK, here is another "concession" we are willing to make: Any Legal adult ages 18 to 100+ is now here by granted full 2nd amendment rights (and Children with parents' permission)
See, we are willing to work with you. Remember these are the things you the anti-gun community have expressed concern over. You want these things gone! No problem, as long as you are willing to afford us the same rights.
Then there is this one: "Well, if it can fire a lot of bullets very quickly, that's a good definition... And then you can argue what a lot is, okay, let's say three. If you haven't hit the deer with three shots, you're a pretty lousy shot, that deer deserves to get away." - Michael Bloomberg. Since Mikey doesn't really give us any definition that can be implemented without eliminating the vast majority of firearms in the world today. We can only assume Little Nappy wants to ban all guns.
Ok, Mr. Napoleon "Complex" Bloomberg If you say so. You just named every firearm in the world. They can all fire more than one bullet. Some fire one at a time, some fire more than one at a time but they are all capable of repeatable firings. I will make a deal with you Sir. If you remove all your bodyguards guns and move to east L.A. and live there without protection. Come back to the table when you can prove your residency in a single family rental with no bodyguards, no guns of your own.
Then we can talk about what the second amendment is "actually" about. (hint) It's about protecting us from people like you. So, you go first, you disarm yourself, your family, and get rid of any bodyguards. That's our deal. Take or leave it. We have compromised enough.
"What's the efficacy of banning these magazine clips? I will tell you these are ammunition, they're bullets, so the people who have those know they're going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these 'high capacity' magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won't be any more available."
Ok, this is an easy one. We can get rid of any magazine that is both the ammunition and a one use only item which CAN NOT be reused. Anything that shoots "bullets' only (not ammunition rounds) and can not be reloaded.
Now, what we want from you: In order to demonstrate you have enough knowledge to pass laws concerning firearms and firearm safety and handling. You will be required to pass a written test, a shooting test and a field strip test, a gun knowledge competency test if you will. If you can't pass these tests then you have no business making laws about firearms. After all you must pass a written and driving test to drive a car, right? Isn't that the litmus test you use to justify hampering gun owners rights. Keeping in mind that driving a car is not a right. However, owning firearms in this country IS AN INALIENABLE RIGHT. So, you MUST prove a much higher level of need before you can violate law abiding citizens' rights.
Remember POTIS 44
"...it is easier for a 12- or 13-year-old to purchase a gun, and cheaper, than it is for them to get a book." - Barack Obama. The next time a 12 or 13 year old tries to purchase a firearm legally and is successful, you let me know.
"We lose 93 million Americans a day to gun violence." - Terry McAuliffe
Excuse me? How many people live in the US?
"We have federal regulations and state laws that prohibit hunting ducks with more than three rounds, and yet it's legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines," Dianne Feinstein
Ok, no problem we can agree to remove any guns that can legally hunt humans with ANY NUMBER of rounds.
First to be banned of course is the most heinous of all evil guns the "Assault Rifle". The number one rifle requested to be banned by all those "experts" in congress and Hollywood.
- Assault Rifle
Ok, so there you go. See, we are willing to compromise. "Quid pro quo" what are you willing to compromise on? How about getting rid of "Gun free zones" since it's where almost all the mass shootings take place. Let's make it a crime to violate a citizens right to keep and BARE arms.
Next weapon we are willing to ban is the AR-15 that weighs as much as ten full moving boxes and fires the .50 cal. Round. If it has a standard AR15 barrel and it is capable of firing a .50 cal. projectile we would be willing to get rid of it. We compromise you must also compromise.
Now your turn! lets have country wide concealed carry, One license that works in 50 states. It would be a boon to state and local government income, crime would go down as would the number of mass shootings and if you want to keep your state license you can, no forced switch to a new one until yours expires. Reciprocity for all citizens of all states.
Next on the list of scary guns and ammo the Socialists hate are those pesky heat seeking missile rounds with incendiary device, the ones that can "lock on" and go around corners. " Some of these bullets, as you saw, have an incendiary device on the tip of it, which is a heat seeking device. So, you don't shoot deer with a bullet that size. If you do you could cook it at the same time." -
So, we are willing to eliminate these rounds from the civilian marketplace. Again, Military, law enforcement and only civilians with the proper documentation can own these. Fair enough?
Now your turn. We want you to recognize that the 2nd amendment of the bill of rights is in fact addressing an individual right not revocable by state or Federal government. The Second Amendment is not just about hunting. It's about self-defense, hunting, protection from tyrannical governments, sport/competition and historical relevance.
We are all ears for compromise, For example the infamous "Ghost gun" that fires 30 bullets in a half second or even the Thirty magazine clip. "This is a ghost gun. This right here has the ability with a .30-caliber clip to disperse with 30 bullets within half a second. Thirty magazine clip in half a second." - Kevin de Leon
Ok, fair enough. Any firearm that can fire 30 bullets in half a second whether it has a "Thirty magazine clip or not"
Will hereby be restricted to military or police or properly licensed FFLs. See we can negotiation!
For this most gracious compromise we will want a reasonable common-sense gun safety measure in return for giving up half second 30 bullet magazine clips. Allow gun safety/training classes in schools again to protect our children from accidental and negligent shooting accidents. We must teach them what true dangers await them in the real world such as misinformation and propaganda as well as training in how to avoid and or spot "unstable people", Propaganda, and potentially dangerous places or people i.e. "GUN FREE ZONES" and "Beta O'Rourke"
"The Second Amendment only protects the people who want all the guns they can have. The rest of us, we've got no Second Amendment. What are we supposed to do?" - Louise Slaughter So, you can be rest assured we will defend your right to keep and bare arms no matter what your politics are we will even protect your right not to carry or own firearms. All we ask is that you do the same for us.
OK, here is another "concession" we are willing to make: Any Legal adult ages 18 to 100+ is now here by granted full 2nd amendment rights (and Children with parents' permission)
See, we are willing to work with you. Remember these are the things you the anti-gun community have expressed concern over. You want these things gone! No problem, as long as you are willing to afford us the same rights.
Then there is this one: "Well, if it can fire a lot of bullets very quickly, that's a good definition... And then you can argue what a lot is, okay, let's say three. If you haven't hit the deer with three shots, you're a pretty lousy shot, that deer deserves to get away." - Michael Bloomberg. Since Mikey doesn't really give us any definition that can be implemented without eliminating the vast majority of firearms in the world today. We can only assume Little Nappy wants to ban all guns.
Ok, Mr. Napoleon "Complex" Bloomberg If you say so. You just named every firearm in the world. They can all fire more than one bullet. Some fire one at a time, some fire more than one at a time but they are all capable of repeatable firings. I will make a deal with you Sir. If you remove all your bodyguards guns and move to east L.A. and live there without protection. Come back to the table when you can prove your residency in a single family rental with no bodyguards, no guns of your own.
Then we can talk about what the second amendment is "actually" about. (hint) It's about protecting us from people like you. So, you go first, you disarm yourself, your family, and get rid of any bodyguards. That's our deal. Take or leave it. We have compromised enough.
"What's the efficacy of banning these magazine clips? I will tell you these are ammunition, they're bullets, so the people who have those know they're going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these 'high capacity' magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won't be any more available."
Ok, this is an easy one. We can get rid of any magazine that is both the ammunition and a one use only item which CAN NOT be reused. Anything that shoots "bullets' only (not ammunition rounds) and can not be reloaded.
Now, what we want from you: In order to demonstrate you have enough knowledge to pass laws concerning firearms and firearm safety and handling. You will be required to pass a written test, a shooting test and a field strip test, a gun knowledge competency test if you will. If you can't pass these tests then you have no business making laws about firearms. After all you must pass a written and driving test to drive a car, right? Isn't that the litmus test you use to justify hampering gun owners rights. Keeping in mind that driving a car is not a right. However, owning firearms in this country IS AN INALIENABLE RIGHT. So, you MUST prove a much higher level of need before you can violate law abiding citizens' rights.
Remember POTIS 44
"...it is easier for a 12- or 13-year-old to purchase a gun, and cheaper, than it is for them to get a book." - Barack Obama. The next time a 12 or 13 year old tries to purchase a firearm legally and is successful, you let me know.
"We lose 93 million Americans a day to gun violence." - Terry McAuliffe
Excuse me? How many people live in the US?
"We have federal regulations and state laws that prohibit hunting ducks with more than three rounds, and yet it's legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines," Dianne Feinstein
Ok, no problem we can agree to remove any guns that can legally hunt humans with ANY NUMBER of rounds.
