JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
RE : Post #2

Exactly.
Even the ladies know.
1664246674555.png
It's not your job to prove you're innocent. It's INNOCENT until proven GUILTY.


Aloha, Mark
 
Last Edited:
This is what measure 114 actually says

The initiative would also prohibit the manufacture, importation, possession, use, purchase, sale, or otherwise transferring of ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. It would make violations a class A misdemeanor.[1]


The initiative would allow licensed firearm dealers to purchase from owners, transfer, or sell ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds to non-resident firearm dealers for the first 180 days after the effective date of the initiative. The initiative would also allow firearm manufacturers with contracts in existence and binding on the effective date of the initiative to complete the contract within the first 180 days after the effective date. For state firearm manufacturers with contracts with the Armed Forces of the United States or a law enforcement agency, the initiative would require ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds to include a permanent stamp or marking stating it the magazine was manufactured after the effective date of the initiative
 
This is what measure 114 actually says

The initiative would also prohibit the manufacture, importation, possession, use, purchase, sale, or otherwise transferring of ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. It would make violations a class A misdemeanor.[1]


The initiative would allow licensed firearm dealers to purchase from owners, transfer, or sell ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds to non-resident firearm dealers for the first 180 days after the effective date of the initiative. The initiative would also allow firearm manufacturers with contracts in existence and binding on the effective date of the initiative to complete the contract within the first 180 days after the effective date. For state firearm manufacturers with contracts with the Armed Forces of the United States or a law enforcement agency, the initiative would require ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds to include a permanent stamp or marking stating it the magazine was manufactured after the effective date of the initiative
So making your own mags from spring, followers and body illegal

POSSESSION is illegal. When they said grandfathered they ment you have 180 days to get rid of them.

Hi cap mags after ban must be marked as after the ban and are legal for LE and gov.
 
This is what measure 114 actually says

The initiative would also prohibit the manufacture, importation, possession, use, purchase, sale, or otherwise transferring of ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. It would make violations a class A misdemeanor.[1]


The initiative would allow licensed firearm dealers to purchase from owners, transfer, or sell ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds to non-resident firearm dealers for the first 180 days after the effective date of the initiative. The initiative would also allow firearm manufacturers with contracts in existence and binding on the effective date of the initiative to complete the contract within the first 180 days after the effective date. For state firearm manufacturers with contracts with the Armed Forces of the United States or a law enforcement agency, the initiative would require ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds to include a permanent stamp or marking stating it the magazine was manufactured after the effective date of the initiative
So it's a national law? All mags have to be stamped by the manufacturer?
No and no.
 
If you're the only shooter thats over 700rds between mag reloads. I think yer good. 🤣

I usually figure a minimum of 10per rifle, but that's considering multiple rifles out of the rack in use at once. The kids all have theirs, but in SHTF, 2 is 1, 1 is none... if they aren't all able to retrieve their personal rifles and beeline for dad's house.... they know I got em covered. KWIM.

10rd probably suits you for the range and shtuff, but if SHTF is in your game plan, two or three 30's (or similar higher capacity) as a fallback can't hurt. Only you know what your SD plan and needs are though.

IE., That 7.62 I only picked up two 10's and four 30's. I don't plan on any more than that.
700? That's rookie numbers. Just saying.
 
Innocent until proven guilty. The burden is on the state to prove you've broken the law.

Think about all the people that purchased mags legally and tossed their receipts because there was no earthly reason to keep them. This is part of the reason mag bans are so stupid. It's incredibly hard to prove you've broken the law...unless they catch coming back into the state with a bag of mags and a dated receipt for them.

If you're really worried, pile up all your mags and take a picture with the front page of a well known (dated) newspaper. But that is nonsense that I personally refuse to engage in. YMMV.

Good luck...and may the odds be ever in your favor!
 
No not national law but mags for law enforcement will need to be stamped.

YOU GUYS NOT READ THE MEASURE. POSSESSION OF HI CAP MAGS IS A CRIME. NO GRANDFATHER CLAUSE
(2) Notwithstanding ORS 166.250 to 166.470, and except as expressly provided in subsections (3) to (5) of this section, a
person commits the crime of unlawful manufacture, importation, possession, use, purchase, sale or otherwise transferring
of large-capacity magazines if the person manufactures, imports, possesses, uses, purchases, sells or otherwise transfers
any large-capacity magazine in Oregon on or after the effective date of this 2022 Act.
 
If 114 doesnt have a grandfather clause this whole subject is moot.
This is what the text of the measure actually states:

(2) Notwithstanding ORS 166.250 to 166.470, and except as expressly provided in subsections (3) to (5) of this section, a
person commits the crime of unlawful manufacture, importation, possession, use, purchase, sale or otherwise transferring
of large-capacity magazines if the person manufactures, imports, possesses, uses, purchases, sells or otherwise transfers
any large-capacity magazine in Oregon on or after the effective date of this 2022 Act.
 
This is what measure 114 actually says

The initiative would also prohibit the manufacture, importation, possession, use, purchase, sale, or otherwise transferring of ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. It would make violations a class A misdemeanor.[1]


The initiative would allow licensed firearm dealers to purchase from owners, transfer, or sell ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds to non-resident firearm dealers for the first 180 days after the effective date of the initiative. The initiative would also allow firearm manufacturers with contracts in existence and binding on the effective date of the initiative to complete the contract within the first 180 days after the effective date. For state firearm manufacturers with contracts with the Armed Forces of the United States or a law enforcement agency, the initiative would require ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds to include a permanent stamp or marking stating it the magazine was manufactured after the effective date of the initiative
Facts matter:

(5) As of the effective date of this 2022 Act, it shall be an affirmative defense, as provided in ORS 166.055, to the unlawful
possession, use and transfer of a large-capacity magazine in this state by any person, provided that:
(a) The large-capacity magazine was owned by the person before the effective date of this 2022 Act and maintained in the
person's control or possession; or



Edit: it appears ORS 166.055 doesn't exist in OR law.

 
Last Edited:
How about instead of thinking of the Rube Goldbergesque methods I've read here, we just band together, get off our collective butts and treat election day like a range trip and go vote these treasonous azzhats out of office. Far more effective than date stamping photos, mailing scans to yourself etc etc etc.
 
I am all in for voting this garbage down but we can walk and chew bubblegum at the same time. It's highly likely this will pass and you can wait to join the hordes of last minute purchasers or sneak in some purchases in early. If it doesn't pass, you will still have your purchases, if it does pass you will have avoided the some crowds and worries about getting in before all administrative heck breaks lose.
 
YOU GUYS NOT READ THE MEASURE. POSSESSION OF HI CAP MAGS IS A CRIME. NO GRANDFATHER CLAUSE
Take another look.

Section 11 seems to state that it is OK to possess them if you owned them before the law went into effect or inherited them from someone who owned them before the law went into effect. However, it does require "affirmative defense," which as I understand it would mean you would have to have evidence of such ownership. Am I correct @ZigZagZeke?
 

Upcoming Events

Tillamook Gun & Knife Show
Tillamook, OR
"The Original" Kalispell Gun Show
Kalispell, MT
Teen Rifle 1 Class
Springfield, OR
Kids Firearm Safety 2 Class
Springfield, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top