This weekend, I went to YouTube university and learned how to take down a Smith revolver to the frame. I performed the task on a well used 625 and a barely used but holster worn 586 so if I mangled the finish, it wasn't on one of my nicer, newer guns. What I noticed with the 625 is that someone had been in there at some point. Don't know when it how often but the signs were there. It was a little cruddy but not awful
My 586 likely had it's cherry popped. There were no marks on any fasteners and the side plate was almost a press fit unit. The insides were robbed of lube long ago and minor surface rust had started here and there but much less than I'd expected.
Neither gun felt gritty or rough before going in so if I didn't decide to crack em open, I'd never have known the difference. Can't say I know many people who regularly go deep into their revolvers, either. I'd it relatively normal to just not maintain these things or is it an intimidation factor? Generally not needed?
My 586 likely had it's cherry popped. There were no marks on any fasteners and the side plate was almost a press fit unit. The insides were robbed of lube long ago and minor surface rust had started here and there but much less than I'd expected.
Neither gun felt gritty or rough before going in so if I didn't decide to crack em open, I'd never have known the difference. Can't say I know many people who regularly go deep into their revolvers, either. I'd it relatively normal to just not maintain these things or is it an intimidation factor? Generally not needed?