Diamond Supporter
- Messages
- 1,158
- Reactions
- 1,822
There's no such thing. "hoarding" is a relative term, a concept at best.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are dealing with "the world as people want it to be", instead of how it really is. Often people "want something" to be fact, so they will find someone to say it is. After that emotion takes over and there is no longer any facts allowed to be heard by them. I have zero doubt you could find some obscure post somewhere to say anything. People who are ruled by emotion will find that and after that no facts that do not agree will ever be seen. <shrug>Do you have a reliable citation to support this claim?
Nothing I've found even comes close.
I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.
Sadly the Fed's have been doing this LONG before Al invented the internet or someone came up with the bumpstock. Long ago someone came up with a semi shotgun with larger capacity. They sold well enough another tooled up to make one. One day the Feds decided these were suddenly an NFA item. They told everyone who had one they could register them free one time. That works fine except that in many states this is a HUGE problem back then.Well isn't the definition of stuff and certain concepts..... a large part of the problem(s) we face?
Like: How the hell did a bump stock.....all of a sudden become a Machine Gun?
Rrrright..... Redefine stuff to suit a perverted view.
View attachment 679659
Aloha, Mark
Was involved in university research in genetics/biochem/microbiology for 15years. Have phud in it. Was head of a university lab group in that area with grants from NIH, NSF, American Cancer Institute, etc. Now am self-supporting plant breeder, but many of my colleagues are university plant breeders.Do you have a reliable citation to support this claim?
Nothing I've found even comes close.
Like: How the hell did a bump stock.....all of a sudden become a Machine Gun?
Tongue in cheek will literally get you Tang... yes.I say this tongue in cheek but didn't NASA get us Tang
Most of the masks are produced in china and korea. In addition, many people in china wear masks fairly regularly because of air pollution. So chinese factories were already producing lots of masks routinely for their own population.If the real problem is actually Shortages.....
Consider how it's the CHINESE fault (or maybe it's just that they are better businessmen)?
Aloha, Mark
Yes, There is no possible way a bump stock could ever emulate the function of a machine gun. Confusing the two could never happen..A bump stock could never fire as fast as a real machine gun. I read that on the internet.
Using that sort of logic......
Owning a "rubber band or coat hanger" .....means that you own a Machine Gun?
IMHO......bump stocks were at one time blessed as legal by the ATF. And in and of itself.......the common bump stock is just a stock.
As I said.....
"Redefine stuff to suit a perverted view."
Aloha, Mark
Most of the masks are produced in china and korea. In addition, many people in china wear masks fairly regularly because of air pollution. So chinese factories were already producing lots of masks routinely for their own population.
Thank Trump for that one. Even the ATF has stated that they have no legal authority to ban bumpstocks. They wrere just told to do it.
Yes, Bumpstocks do fire a lot faster and more reliably than with the rubber band slight of hand. The mechanism makes no difference. Its the cyclic rate that does. On the flip side the coat hanger ( swift link) thing is as much of a machine gun as an actual M16 sear machine gun. The coat hanger just subs in for the sear or lightning link. Different design same thing. Same thing with the shoestring trick. Bolt closes, hammer drops with no additional input from the operator. Machine Gun.
There is a difference.
The mere ownership of a bump stock makes you a felon.
The mere ownership of a rubberband or coat hanger doesn't make you a felon.
As for the TRUMP comment.....Whatever.
Aloha, Mark
The whatever is true. Trump is no friend to the 2nd amendment . Never has been.
You can own a rubber band. You can own a coat hanger. If you fashion a coat hanger or any other piece of metal into a swift link you have created a machine gun. Thats on you. Intent and all . Lots of case law backing that up. No case law backing up bump stocks. If you fashion a piece of metal into a lightning link or a DIAS you have created a machine gun. According to the ATF and its ultimate head if you own a bump stock you own a machine gun. Pretty cut and dry really.
The whatever is true. Trump is no friend to the 2nd amendment . Never has been.
You can own a rubber band. You can own a coat hanger. If you fashion a coat hanger or any other piece of metal into a swift link you have created a machine gun. Thats on you. Intent and all . Lots of case law backing that up. No case law backing up bump stocks. If you fashion a piece of metal into a lightning link or a DIAS you have created a machine gun. According to the ATF and its ultimate head if you own a bump stock you own a machine gun. Pretty cut and dry really.